Hi Jim.
The lawyer I had was an ex-crown, and no cheap. I'd like to think he did the best he could. Like you, I brought the matter of the guns up right away, and way told it didn't matter if not on the warrant.
If someone here is really a lawyer, then they might see something myself, or the lawyer didn't.
But to suggest it a search for computers would mean police turn a blind eye to having found unsafe guns, or drugs? Regardless what a warrant says, is a crime not a crime?
Its like a cop letting an impared driver go, bcause he only pulled him over for speeding.
well myself i would never trust an x crown attorney remember they use to represent the police in court so they like the deal making things gives them a win with little fight why do you think the crown in your case offered a deal in the first place ,cause they had no case and to compare a issue with a warrent and a speeding drunk driver is 2 very diffrent cases first they have every reason to pull you over for speeding what you get caught for after that is a free bee for them but a warrent they are actually going to a judge and asking permission to search your place so 2 very diffrent situations
Problem is, even if you're right, its now all done. The lawyers, the fees, the court and judgement. If grounds for appeal, then I might try that once talking to a lawyer who deals mainly with guns this week.
As for not telling the whole story: No threats online. It was a family dispute, and a member alleged videos making fun of them and other 'pranks' were harassment. An IP pinned the computers, but a lack of 'who was responsible' saw the charges dropped. Thats it.