I want to get an antique revolver. I want something more modern from the later part of the 1800's. I want double action and center fire.
I have reloaded for 20 years and do wish to use smokeless powder with the obvious precautions. I would prefer to use a cartridge that is easy to reload but not opposed to trying something more challenging like 41 LC. I am prepared to go through the work of working brass from other calibers. Not a fan of casting my own projectiles as I had bad lead levels in the past.
This gun would be a shooter. I have plenty of handguns but want that unique experience that an antique handgun offers. 1. It can be of a barrel length or caliber that would otherwise make an handgun 12(6) 12(7). 2. Heck just having a handgun that I can shoot at the camp is down right going to put a smile on my face. The most use it would get in an outing would be less than 50rds but It would be used.
I am not hung up on historical artifact stuff regarding this gun. I would be fine with refinished, reworked, modified, shaved cylinder, etc. In short it would be a shooter and not a collector. As such I would probably like something that is not weak and fall apart on me all the time.
Some guns I am considering and my thoughts on them.
1. Colt 1892 DA in 41 LC. A friend has one and I like it a lot. Ammo is a little bit of a PITA to reload for and get accuracy and the gun can have weak lock work I hear. My wife and I like it a lot. Despite the reputation the gun has for weak lock work my friend has no issues with his. I favor this a lot but await your opinions on this.
2. Webley MK1, MK2. In shaved form that would be easy as I have a 45acp spiting out brass. Problem is my wife who is an avid shooter cant operate the release. So this will likely not happen.
3. Webley RIC, MP, Bulldog. These look nice. Calibers can be easy to load for or change them from say 450 Adams or 455 to 45 ACP/45 auto rim. I hear the use of them in DA is hard on the guns.
4. S&W 44 DA. Easy to load for. Ugly on IMHO. Good rep as a shooter.
Feel free to chime in on the subject at hand. I welcome all your thoughts. Keep in mind it will be an occasional shooter that could see a couple hundred rounds a year down range.
Thanks folks.
Cheers.
Moe
I have reloaded for 20 years and do wish to use smokeless powder with the obvious precautions. I would prefer to use a cartridge that is easy to reload but not opposed to trying something more challenging like 41 LC. I am prepared to go through the work of working brass from other calibers. Not a fan of casting my own projectiles as I had bad lead levels in the past.
This gun would be a shooter. I have plenty of handguns but want that unique experience that an antique handgun offers. 1. It can be of a barrel length or caliber that would otherwise make an handgun 12(6) 12(7). 2. Heck just having a handgun that I can shoot at the camp is down right going to put a smile on my face. The most use it would get in an outing would be less than 50rds but It would be used.
I am not hung up on historical artifact stuff regarding this gun. I would be fine with refinished, reworked, modified, shaved cylinder, etc. In short it would be a shooter and not a collector. As such I would probably like something that is not weak and fall apart on me all the time.
Some guns I am considering and my thoughts on them.
1. Colt 1892 DA in 41 LC. A friend has one and I like it a lot. Ammo is a little bit of a PITA to reload for and get accuracy and the gun can have weak lock work I hear. My wife and I like it a lot. Despite the reputation the gun has for weak lock work my friend has no issues with his. I favor this a lot but await your opinions on this.
2. Webley MK1, MK2. In shaved form that would be easy as I have a 45acp spiting out brass. Problem is my wife who is an avid shooter cant operate the release. So this will likely not happen.
3. Webley RIC, MP, Bulldog. These look nice. Calibers can be easy to load for or change them from say 450 Adams or 455 to 45 ACP/45 auto rim. I hear the use of them in DA is hard on the guns.
4. S&W 44 DA. Easy to load for. Ugly on IMHO. Good rep as a shooter.
Feel free to chime in on the subject at hand. I welcome all your thoughts. Keep in mind it will be an occasional shooter that could see a couple hundred rounds a year down range.
Thanks folks.
Cheers.
Moe



















































