Oh, and btw, I am not arguing. I am sincerely interested in proof of serial prefix overlap.
Gotcha Kurgan. I was not arguing either.
I didn't think you were.
Oh, and btw, I am not arguing. I am sincerely interested in proof of serial prefix overlap.
Wow, here I thought the commies kept records well. Haha. I've had a few sks' and all others were simple. This one not so much. Honestly only reason why I was trying to find out is I have it up for sale and someone was asking. Thanks all for the great info and maybe we all learned something from this weirdo. Haha
All serialized parts are matching, receiver, trigger guard, and bolt. Does not have original stock or Mag. Has a synthetic monte-carlo stock on it now along with a aftermarket railed dust cover.This question about the barrel lug numbers comes up fairly frequently.
The timing stamps-- 22 on the barrel lug (blurry) and the 22 on the receiver -- appear to be in the same size and font which would indicate an original barrel-reciever pair.
Essentially, the barreled receiver became a single part, and required only one serial number.
Do you have any other matching serialized parts to the rifle?
I will investigate the single prefixes closely, but no overlap with double letter. This stuff fascinates me, and I want to be proven wrong.