Hey .275 Rigby fans...

I think the velocity is pretty tame for a 140 gr bullet, the 7X57s load we like clocks a 140 gr TTSX at 2900 from a Brno 600, but North American ammo companies have always underloaded this cartridge. The .275 Rigby head stamp is cool though. Having said that, chronographs tend to be somewhat individualistic, so it would be interesting to shoot this factory stuff across the same screens to see how it compares to our 2900 fps load.
 
I see they're offering brass with the .275 headstamp too... might be a better option than the watered down factory ammo for those of us who reload... if it's available in canada! 2900 with a 140 has been my experience with the 7x57 as well. 2680 is what I would expect from a bullet 20 grs. heavier.
 
The .275 Rigby and the 7X57 are the same cartridge. As for the legality of the round in Southern Ontario, it depends on the wording of the legislation and of the interpretation of that legislation by LEOs and the courts. IMHO, the stamp on the barrel only identifies the cartridge the rifle is chambered for, while "caliber" refers to the widest measurement of the bore, which would be .284". This question was discussed at some length recently.

http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/foru...hic-caliber-limitations?p=9610227#post9610227
 
Not mine, but certainly on topic....

watermark.php



and interestingly, note the headstamp on this Kynoch .275 ammo:
275RigbyKynoch7mm.jpg
 
1-A with a 24" barrel. Hopefully, with out wood on them but that's not 100% yet.

The .275 Rigby makes for a very mild recoiling and easy to shoot chambering, but even so I am worried it would be a handfull without a stock.

Do you have an ETA and price yet?
 
Back
Top Bottom