What constitutes a great gun for the money? One that only fails once per magazine or once per box(50 rounds)? I'm far from a Norinco fan but I wouldn't hesitate to run a Norc over a Hi-Point anyday. The price difference is negligible and the support available for Norcs is extensive. The excuse that such low dollar gear is a great for the beginner is without merit. With other low dollar options with better support, better design, and better overall quality. The Hi-Point doesn't even compare.
Although a low dollar gun may seem ideal for one who is getting started, they aren't in the long run. For the beginner spending a couple, hundred bucks on a gun is an easy "in". The problem is, should the new shooter decide to get serious about their discipline they will no doubt seek out better gear. With the addition of better gear the starter gun is no longer needed. The resale on a low dollar POS that has probably been shot alot, is next to nothing. The same problem exists should the new shooter decide to pursue other activities. Recovering ones initial investment by selling their low dollar gun will be challenging at best. If the beginner started with a quality pistol they stand to lose less should they decide to sell it. Also, starting out with a quality gun means little chance of failures or broken parts. Starting with a quality pistol eliminates the need to upgrade later when the shooter advances.
TDC
I respect your opinion & I wont debate with you any more, However, Im curious about your personal experiences with either the Hi point or norincos. The final point, How much money can you lose buying then selling a $280 pistol?


















































