I've had a full day with the result of a bunch of PC and Hi-Tek coating bullets for 9mm. I took my time and enjoyed every single phase of what I was doing. I've "painted" around 9000 bullets today.
Now at the end I was thinking about the amount of work that I had to put for each one compared with the results. Hi-Tek coating is by far more time consuming and elaborate procedure compared with PC. Once the procedures in place Hi-Tek is relatively simple. What makes it more time consuming is the fact that a number of two coats minimum is required. Imagine doing the same thing twice(or even three times) for let's say a tray of bullets. So yes, it more time consuming.
PC is easy breezy what a sleazy. One coat and done. Even that PC requires 15 minutes and Hi-Tek only 10, with PC the productivity is way better.
Now the results are debatable. I speak for myself so if anyone has a different opinion I totally agree.
So the final test is: bullets rushing out the gun barrel vs what they leave on the barrel inside walls. I personally could not make a really visible difference between Hi-Tek and PC. For real. If a personal verdict would be required shooting wise, I'd go with Hi-Tek. But thinking at the amount of time spent (not wasted) I would have to think again and again which one should I choose in the future. I'm still not 100% sure that Hi-Tek is really worth the extra time vs PC-ing even though my procedures are clockwork. The oven is never empty. Two trays go out and another two go in right away. I have no dead times. So I'm not fumbling around at all.
I use an oven rated "big", but big if I compared with a lil' toaster oven. If I would have an oven the size of the one I use in my kitchen....heck yeah.....I would Hi-Tek exclusively.
1000 bullets every 10-11 minutes going in the oven would make the process 100% worth the time. In two hours with all the phases in place, I could get 10 000 bullets coated, easy.
Anyway, these are my thoughts for now I thought I'd share with y'all.
Here some pictures with few bullets ready to rock'n'roll.
[/IMG]
[/IMG]
Now at the end I was thinking about the amount of work that I had to put for each one compared with the results. Hi-Tek coating is by far more time consuming and elaborate procedure compared with PC. Once the procedures in place Hi-Tek is relatively simple. What makes it more time consuming is the fact that a number of two coats minimum is required. Imagine doing the same thing twice(or even three times) for let's say a tray of bullets. So yes, it more time consuming.
PC is easy breezy what a sleazy. One coat and done. Even that PC requires 15 minutes and Hi-Tek only 10, with PC the productivity is way better.
Now the results are debatable. I speak for myself so if anyone has a different opinion I totally agree.
So the final test is: bullets rushing out the gun barrel vs what they leave on the barrel inside walls. I personally could not make a really visible difference between Hi-Tek and PC. For real. If a personal verdict would be required shooting wise, I'd go with Hi-Tek. But thinking at the amount of time spent (not wasted) I would have to think again and again which one should I choose in the future. I'm still not 100% sure that Hi-Tek is really worth the extra time vs PC-ing even though my procedures are clockwork. The oven is never empty. Two trays go out and another two go in right away. I have no dead times. So I'm not fumbling around at all.
I use an oven rated "big", but big if I compared with a lil' toaster oven. If I would have an oven the size of the one I use in my kitchen....heck yeah.....I would Hi-Tek exclusively.
1000 bullets every 10-11 minutes going in the oven would make the process 100% worth the time. In two hours with all the phases in place, I could get 10 000 bullets coated, easy.
Anyway, these are my thoughts for now I thought I'd share with y'all.
Here some pictures with few bullets ready to rock'n'roll.


