A kind of half answer is to avoid the various commemotatives. For example I once owned a 1967 Canadian Centennial rifle. Within two hundred rounds the stamped shell lifter broke.
Also something more serious related to the shell stop.
This convinced me toake this rifle go away.
Is too bad as it had a wonderful barrel otherwise.
Had a post '64 with advanced, visible wear to the locking abutments in the receiver. The bolt was able to move rearward over 1/32nd of an inch. Primers protruded. Because the receiver was compromised, the only repair would have been to set the barrel back and rechamber. Sold it as a wall hanger.
despite thousands of rounds
A kind of half answer is to avoid the various commemotatives. For example I once owned a 1967 Canadian Centennial rifle. Within two hundred rounds the stamped shell lifter broke.
Also something more serious related to the shell stop.
This convinced me toake this rifle go away.
Is too bad as it had a wonderful barrel otherwise.
Those aren't meant to shoot, just impress people who like shiny objects.
Grizz
Those aren't meant to shoot, just impress people who like shiny objects.
Grizz
Nice, never heard of anyone running many rounds through 94s, hence my wondering.
Nice, never heard of anyone running many rounds through 94s, hence my wondering.
I replaced my lifter and lever with post '71 versions. I don't remember if I replaced the lever link/cartridge stop.A kind of half answer is to avoid the various commemotatives. For example I once owned a 1967 Canadian Centennial rifle. Within two hundred rounds the stamped shell lifter broke.
Also something more serious related to the shell stop.
This convinced me toake this rifle go away.
Is too bad as it had a wonderful barrel otherwise.




























