I bet you that the bolt on the HK won't chip after the first 40 roundsBut it's HK! It must be good if they use it in all the movies! Plus HK guns are the best for airsofting!
Must be the reason why Navy Seals are still using the M1 Garand...If you were in the Special Forces or in the military and knew how to use a rifle with your eyes closed (ie instinctively) and knew it worked for you, would you really go to a new unfamiliar rifle if you had the choice ??
Must be the reason why Navy Seals are still using the M1 Garand...
I would argue that. You have two guns that will fire whether they are run through mud, sand or water. That piece of crap AR15 will jam first round after something like that. Plus you can shoot the others anywhere not just at a range so I beg to differ friend the other two you get more bang for the buck because you can shoot them anywhere and through any conditions.Another thing to remember is that while the HK may be overpriced at $4200, you are still getting more bang for the buck than you would with a $3000 garage-assembled, breakage-prone XCR or a plastic Israeli gun named after a gypsy trailer park.
As a main battle rifle?That would be the M1A or M14...
Sorry buds
The XCR does not even need sand or mud to jam (and break parts). And while I admit that I don't know much about the Tavor, the picture of a chipped bolt posted by Armedsask certainly does not inspire great confidence in that gun.I would argue that. You have two guns that will fire whether they are run through mud, sand or water. That piece of crap AR15 will jam first round after something like that. Plus you can shoot the others anywhere not just at a range so I beg to differ friend the other two you get more bang for the buck because you can shoot them anywhere and through any conditions.
As a main battle rifle?
And the Swiss arms weights like a target rifle........if I have to haul the weight of 9lb, I can get a 18" SPR that comes with KAC FF rail already plus all the BUIS gadgets.
As a main battle rifle?
Gas pistons have been around since before the second world war. The decision to take it is out was purely a cost based one.
Folded sheet metal actually, which isn't all that expensive to manufacture.That extra weight is solid steel parts
Folded sheet metal actually, which isn't all that expensive to manufacture.
What makes Sig's folded sheet metal more expensive to produce than AK's (other than the high wages of the Swiss workers)?I'll take folded steel over machined aluminum alloy any day of the week. folded sheet metal is only cheap to produce on an AK.
What makes Sig's folded sheet metal more expensive to produce than AK's (other than the high wages of the Swiss workers)?
I have no doubt that Swiss Arms rifles are manufactured to a much higher standard than AK-47 and are therefore more expensive to produce. But that's not the point. My comment was about the cost of the mateiral itself (sheet metal).Well first off, the steel is much, much harder. Secondly, the internal rails are both brazed and spot welded to the receiver body. Next, the tolerences on all threads, and holes are kept to very tight tolerances so all parts will fit and function without modification. Threads are also timed so that barrels are easy to install and index. And finally the finish is a very durable epoxy type far superior to any AK finish. Then there are the high wages.




























