Holosun 509T does not have a picatinny / 1913 mount.

Astute Observer

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
76   0   0
Location
Ottawa
Just a heads up for anyone considering a Holosun 509T. The mounting design is not picatinny / 1913. They are completely incompatible. The sides of the mount do not extend down far enough to grip a 1913 rail.

I was mistakenly under the impression that it was, but I got one in the mail today and that's definitely not the case. See photos showing the gap there.

zSsAjtj.jpg

Note the gap

yxh0RMM.jpg

The bottom of the "claws" (don't know what they're actually called) don't go far enough to latch on to the angle of the rail. In this case I was unable to use a 45 degree Haley Strategic picatinny mount.

You get a RMR plate, which is cool though. However with a Glock MOS for example, now you're stacking two plates on each other. Probably more useful for a pistol with a dedicated RMR cut slide. As a plus, you could remove the optic with a side mounted torx bolt, so if you shoot IPSC in both production and production optics, removing or replacing the 509T is really easy. Once you have that RMR plate installed it'll stay there, and you just remove the optic from that plate.

For a rifle or shotgun, it won't go on a picatinny mount, though if you can find a dedicated picatinny RMR mount, that might be a solution. But again you have to use the supplied RMR mounting plate as an intermediary.

Anyways, just figured I'd mention it so nobody makes the same mistake as me. I'll probably keep it as I do have a pistol it can go on, but that wasn't my Plan A.
 
Last edited:
Interesting. I thought they were supposed to use the Aimpoint ACRO footprint, but I understand that they don't fit that, either. It's entirely unique.

Bradley
 
just checked holosun website. They do not claim that it comes/mounts to a picatinny rail. Only mentions that it comes with a RMR plate

Exactly. The OP misunderstood the factory literature regarding the HS509 mounting system. It is not an oversight that it does not fit Picatinny mounts. Holosun deliberately adopted a replaceable bottom plate so that the 509 would fit a variety of mounting configurations using different adapter plates. What the OP mistakenly thought was a picatinny dovetail is simply the clamping system for Holosun's interchangeable series of bottom plates to fit a variety of different handguns. Bottom plates for mounting systems other than the RMR cut will follow in the future, including (presumably) a properly-dimensioned Picatinny mount.

Here is the new 509 properly mounted to an RMR cut on the CZ P10F Optics Ready pistol. Yes, 2 plates are stacked in this case - the CZ adapter plate for RMR-cut optics, plus the Holosun adapter plate. Personally, I don't foresee a problem, athough the single Holosun adapter plate directly attached to an RMR Cut on a pistol slide would probably be preferable (one potential failure point versus two):


20201208-073545.jpg



20201208-073507.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yup I fully admit it was my mistake. I assumed looking at the image that it would fit on picatinny, but they never made that claim. I'm just letting anyone else who might be as dumb as me not to make the same mistake.
 
I'm running one on my Masada till the G45 MOS shows up :), what are your impressions? for me, with an astigmatism the reticle works, and so far so good. I will admit, once you see how tiny it is? you think how could that fit on a stnd pic rail?
 
Would a strike industries REX fit one of these?
No — the optic is too wide for the REX.
I don’t have a 509T but I have a 508T and they are identical in width. Out of curiosity I tried it in the REX and it doesn’t fit — too wide.
 
Back
Top Bottom