How Beretta could have made the RX4 Not Suck!

sorry i have been waiting on this gun for a while and got a little antce,
i apoligisze to you but evry time i start a thred about the rx4 it disaperse
it was ment to thwe guy yoou comeneted on.
i just wanted in on the thread.
mostly i want to know if anyone hase any thing usefull to say about this gun more than the "ugly or nice" talk.

long day must sleep,
 
Last edited:
beretta_ar70.jpg

Ick!
 
Yeah, I would take an AR70/90 over an AR180B but it's still kinda ugly :D:p

I think I want an XCR and an XCR-M overall... maybe an FN SCAR H and SCAR L but we'll have to see how that plays out. The SIG stuff is starting to grow on me. OKDave let me fire his Sig CQB a few weeks ago and it was pretty awesome :D
Wrong Way said:
Hey Wally....Could you photoshop an MP5 stock onto that thing? I think that would be the best overall look, but without seeing I can't say for sure.
Click to expand...
myRx43.jpg

Good call WW, that looks pretty sick :D
 
Last edited:
Wrong Way said:
Good attempt Wally, but the proportions are waaaaaay off :D
The rear sight is the same thickness as the wrist of the stock!
Click to expand...
Hey, Don't look a gift horse in the mouth :p

Yeah, I don't have either an MP5 or an RX4 so I was shootin' from the hip. Ya get the idea though. I still think it looks purdy good.
 
(a) it's a Benelli Super 90 in 5.56mm;
(b) the AR70/90 is not as good as an AR-15, which is why Italian special forces use the M4;
(c) I'm convinced that Beretta will never make a decent assault rifle.

Bear in mind the AR-70 was developed together with SIG and was originally known as the SG-530. SIG developed it into the SG-540, and then the SG550 we all know and love.

Beretta however stuck a god awful carry handle on it and various other retarded features.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom