I was told first hand by the CFO of southern Alberta that when Klein made that promise he was blowing smoke that C 68 would not be upheld in AB and that no gov't official can authorize what parts of the criminal code are enforced and what are not. That does make sense too.While it appears you are right, I think LEO 's just have bigger fish to fry than chasing guys that are just breaking paper laws. But who knows for sure?
While that may be technically true, my understanding is that the RCMP in Alberta report to the Alberta Attorney General and he can instruct them and the crown attorneys under his authority that C-68 paper violations are not to be pursued because they are a waste of resources. I can't say that this has happened, but the AG certainly has the authority to dictate what priorities will be on the list and where.
Both the RCMP and the crown have limited resources and have to make daily choices about what their priorities are. In Ontario it would seem that TPS and Chief Bliar have decided that paperwork violations are at the top of their list and real criminals rate farther down, while Alberta may have opted for a different approach.
IMO, the word of the CFO is suspect at best, anyway. He is a federal appointee and is simply parroting the official Liberal bureaucrat line on C-68. He may wish it was so, but attitudes towards guns and gun laws are very different here than in Toronto.
Mark


















































