I hunted for several years with a #1A in .270 that was traded off when the clay target bug hit hard and my interest in rifle hunting declined.
I liked the rifle's compactness and handling but like most Rugers always felt it was a great design that was poorly executed. The barrel on mine was the worst for copper fouling of any rifle I've owned. The edges on the lever were sharp often resulting in a cut hand when practising fast reloading. The scope positioning required a long eye relief scope or extension rings. It was also a bit of a bugger to reassemble when taken apart for cleaning.
Mine was accurate enough. The first round from a cold barrel always went to the POA with the second within half an inch and the third an inch and a half high which was more than adequate for hunting.
But it's a classic looking rifle with a lot of style. Although I'm still not much of a rifle hunter I get the itch to own another one every time I see an #1S in .45-70.
I liked the rifle's compactness and handling but like most Rugers always felt it was a great design that was poorly executed. The barrel on mine was the worst for copper fouling of any rifle I've owned. The edges on the lever were sharp often resulting in a cut hand when practising fast reloading. The scope positioning required a long eye relief scope or extension rings. It was also a bit of a bugger to reassemble when taken apart for cleaning.
Mine was accurate enough. The first round from a cold barrel always went to the POA with the second within half an inch and the third an inch and a half high which was more than adequate for hunting.
But it's a classic looking rifle with a lot of style. Although I'm still not much of a rifle hunter I get the itch to own another one every time I see an #1S in .45-70.




















































