Was the trigger guard refinished ? If not, then, it's barely used... The alloy trigger guards are prone to nicks...
Barely used…not refinished
Was the trigger guard refinished ? If not, then, it's barely used... The alloy trigger guards are prone to nicks...
I checked under the bolt lever and there’s an “L” but do you know what it means?Your rifle probably started as a 3000 Crown Grade or a 1640 MC and had the barrel replaced, the stock was also worked on, as per the rosewood fore end noses were squared, the round ones were plastic, not rosewood.
There should have the SN electro-penciled under the bolt lever. The serial and proof (NITRO) was initially stamped on the left side of the barrel.
The "L" doesn't tell us anything, as per it's most likely a batch or a view stamp.I checked under the bolt lever and there’s an “L” but do you know what it means?
My only "guess" is, "they anticipated that war was to brake-open."I don't know if this has been asked before I was looking at the Husqvarna Firearms Serial Numbers chart anybody know why in 1937 the production jumped by 20,000 in one year from an average of 1,500-2000?
Seems it's a late 648.My ugly duckling in 8x57
View attachment 1074268
At one point I looked up the serial and found it to be a 1952.Seems it's a late 648.
That could be. It's within the years range they offered that type of stock.At one point I looked up the serial and found it to be a 1952.
One needs to keep in mind that most of these 60 and way over 80 years old used guns were sold for a reason and most of the time, it's because of a lack of care, use under harsh environment and bubba's "improvement" work...On one of those picker shows on TV (American Picker, Salvage Hunter, Salvage Kings, etc.), they mentioned that if an object has three things wrong with it, then you should walk away. I have been saved from many a Husqvarna purchase by remembering their godawful triggers, the poorly soldered front sights (that will fall off sooner or later), the ubiquitous tang cracks and the likelihood of more hidden internal stock cracks, the lack of recoil pads, the way the checkering runs off the bottom of the grip. That said, I have still purchased way more than my share of Husqvarna rifles and shotguns in the last 4 decades or more.
Well, it's your call. I'm not gonna argue further than that, I leave internet debates to those who have more free time than I have.I forgot to mention the poorly anodized(?) aluminum alloy bottom metal. Easy to wear off and looks horrible when it does. So...the godawful triggers, the poorly soldered front sights, lack of recoil pads, the way that the checkering runs off the bottom of the grip...forgetting the tang cracks...that's still more than three things wrong. LOL
Argument?...I was just stating the (3+ things wrong) reasons that have saved me from buying more Husqvarnas than I should have...and I have bought plenty. I really didn't realize the bottom metal coating was just paint. Anyone have ideas about what type of paint?Well, it's your call. I'm not gonna argue further than that, I leave internet debates to those who have more free time than I have.
And BTW, the bottom metal was not anodized, it was painted.




























