Why are we talking about bolt guns when there is a reasonable range of choices in semi auto? People were shooting WK180 at ORA before the OIC.
SR can definitely continue with semi auto - WK180 and WS MCR are reasonable priced rifles. There are also Bushmaster ACR and many many X95/TAVOR in circulation, as well as FN FNAR. HK SL8 is not exactly rare in Canada either. There also a few semi like K&M, KelTech RBD, robarm M96, FN 2000.....
I know people are sad their match grade ARs ( or thumb up their noses at anything not AR or upgradable to match grade) are no go at least for now before the legal actions are concluded, but I do not think it is the right move to uphold the tradition of practicing/training what the "militia" do for marksmanship, nor does it contribute to the argument to the court and government that semi auto is necessary for sporting. We will be falling into the reverse of the fallacy the OIC committed, by that these rifles have no sporting and hunting use, and in the next paragraph acknowledging the natives do use these rifle for hunting.
We need to talk the talk, and then walk the walk when it comes to using semi auto in SVC. We have two legals actions with both SVC shooters from the BC and ON as both applicants and makers of affidavit - it is not productive to do the opposite while they argue for us that AR15 and semi auto are essential to conduct SVC. We should stick with what we are doing with semi auto until 2 years from now if they actually confiscate our AR15s.
My opinion is that the Rifle associations and the match directors should not break rank with the legal actions. We must not act like we are defeated before we are defeated either, this is the start of the break down of the cohesion of us as a group. We must have a united front. SVC is to be conducted with semi auto because semi auto is essential to SVC. This is the sporting purpose of semi.