Not trying to sound like a lawyer, but if the landlord granted Tactical 870 a Right to hunt on his property, than tactical does have legal stand to allow him to intercept, eject or charge anybody who encroaches on that right, provided that he can prove having that right. Not much different than a tenancy situation, where the tenant has all those rights.
Also, the crock's using Tactical's equipment/blind, in my opinion, amounts to the theft of his property, also entitling him to defend his property. The trespasser doesn't need to move his blind. By siting in it, he has unlawfully taken possession of somebody else's property.
Accordingly, in my humble opinion, one bird shot (7/12 or 8, not larger than 20 ga) fired at the perpetrator's butt from a distance, not less than 12 meters is perfectly justified! Disclaimer; Please note that I am not a real judge. Proceed at your own peril!
Also, the crock's using Tactical's equipment/blind, in my opinion, amounts to the theft of his property, also entitling him to defend his property. The trespasser doesn't need to move his blind. By siting in it, he has unlawfully taken possession of somebody else's property.
Accordingly, in my humble opinion, one bird shot (7/12 or 8, not larger than 20 ga) fired at the perpetrator's butt from a distance, not less than 12 meters is perfectly justified! Disclaimer; Please note that I am not a real judge. Proceed at your own peril!
Last edited:


















































