downwindtracker2 said:
			
		
	
	
		
		
			Of the last four rifles,three have been various M-98 mausers.A P-14 sneaked in. They are not without their faults,the receiver is a bit flexable and the recoil lug needs a crossbolt.
		
		
	 
And what sort of action is the 
P-14 based on?!
 
 
I think modern metallurgy has helped the M98 a lot too.
People keep comparing the M98 to the M700 which is hard to do.
One is a forged receiver and the other is basically a tube construction receiver.
As such the characteristics are hugely different.
But event taking into account the improvement in steel, Paul Mauser deliberately heat treated the 
OUTSIDE of the action to strengthen it and left the 
INSIDE of the chamber softer to deal with the pressure.
Now that is 
serious inventiveness in the fact of the limitations of materials and technology.
 
 
But as I said before, if the M98 is 
designed for a cartridge it deals well.
If it is designed for 375 H&H, 416 Rigby or 458 Win Mag then it copes wonderfully.
If it is a modern M98 designed for standard length magnum cartridges(i.e. BSA, Parker Hale and CZ actions) then it deals well with them too and so on.
One of the most unappreciated M98 actions were those made for the 7x57, the intermediate length.
Chamber one to 284 Win, 6.5/284 or a short action cartridge like 260 Rem or 7mm-08 which benefit from extra throat length and you have one cracker of a rifle.
Nick Harvey, a well respected Aussie gun writer and reloading expert, has a BSA Royal with an intermediate action originally chambered to 7x57 which he had rebarreled to 284 Win many years ago.
My stomach churns at the idea of bastardising a good rifle in this classic chambering for what is arguably only a small boost in overall performance.
 
 
Despite this his rifle has taken trophies all over the world and he finds it extremely useful to be able to seat 160gn and 175gn bullets right out, 
It goes without saying it is exceptionally accurate.
