I dont see how you are being rude. Everyone is entitled to his opinion.
No probs.
The HK mag i got are the latest gen made for the hk416 that have the tolerance between the mag body and follower rehashed. Hence the problem with the slightest amount of dust in them.
To put it at its simplest form, after having tested them, they simply don't work for me.
Hence the objective conclusion report:
1-TOO expensive
2-cannot rebuild them...
3-Heavy as lead
4-Prone to breakages as anything else on the market.
5-Just as prone to deformation as anything else on the market
6- They still rust, a problem which no other type of Alu, Magnesium or plastic mags have...
No harm in saying that.
KPA
All mags seem to have their pro’s and con’s.
Problem I experienced with most 30 rnd polymer mags is the lips deform by flexing outward a bit when kept fully loaded (30rnds) for extended periods of time because of the upward spring pressure unlike conventional aluminum or steel mags which seem less likely to flex unless worn out. This can cause feeding problems in the poly mags in the long run.
Also in extreme cold there can be quite a bit more of a dimensional change to the polymer mags from contraction compared to alloy mags. Depending on a whole host of other variations this can present some feeding and seating problems in some AR’s.
I’ll stick to mil spec aluminum with ant-tilt for those reasons alone, so long as the aluminum mags are maintained they have few feeding issues and unlike polymer mags they are battle proven in all environments.





























.. but don’t ya think the little cap is kind of a stupid stop gap measure for a design flaw that has been known in poly mags for the last 30 years?






















