He was shooting lapua brass in his test loads as indicated in the first post.
Ahhh! Must have been asleep when I read that post.
He was shooting lapua brass in his test loads as indicated in the first post.
It wouldn't be the first rifle that got a continuous diet of proof loads either.
The SAAMI standard for a proof load is 30% higher than the maximum allowable pressure.
Thanks for all the insight guys
Finally got around to reload some rounds and take a look at the brass in question. Everyone with a ejector mark is about 0.005 under book OAL which is 2.025. Could have had case lune residue on them prior to shooting but won't know now haha. Neck diameter is 0.003 for fired brass over loaded ammo. I'm noticing that once running the brass through the die is also leaving a ridge on the base of the neck; noticeable when running a finger nail over it.
Now I'm at the point where I'm wondering if it's the die that's leaving this mark or it's time to buy a neck turner. Either way I'll give it one more round at this load with proper brass OAL and see where it takes me.
Thanks for all the insight guys
Finally got around to reload some rounds and take a look at the brass in question. Everyone with a ejector mark is about 0.005 under book OAL which is 2.025. Could have had case lune residue on them prior to shooting but won't know now haha. Neck diameter is 0.003 for fired brass over loaded ammo. I'm noticing that once running the brass through the die is also leaving a ridge on the base of the neck; noticeable when running a finger nail over it.
http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com...r-brass-5-56-and-223-rem-base-hardness-tests/
Now I'm at the point where I'm wondering if it's the die that's leaving this mark or it's time to buy a neck turner. Either way I'll give it one more round at this load with proper brass OAL and see where it takes me.