Is glass quality and clarity not linear and logical?

I’ve never had an expensive scope. In my experience when you hit the $250 ballpark it is rugged, quite clear, and trouble free. I’ve only had Burris and Vortex in this ballpark.

The cheap ones can break or come defective brand new (bushnells I’ve had), or give a second rate user experience in some aspect. For example a friends cheap Simmons was garbage, my cheap Simmons works great on a 22 but it’s nothing to write home about.

It may just be that like me you’re satisfied with something that works well and doesn’t break and is clear, while paying vastly more for incremental improvement is not pertinent to your (or my) particular application.

It’s cool to have a Ferrari but it functions the same in a school zone as a Tercel.
 
I have always looked for "bang for the buck" and it has served me well. Mostly Leupold scopes over many years of hunting and have never had an issue. I was always concerned that lower end scopes would potentially ruin a costly hunt so it seemed like false economy to go too cheap. I've seen a friend lose a moose on a fly-in hunt because his cheap scope fogged and he couldn't see through it. If you are just hunting locally maybe you can take a chance on a lesser scope (and of course still no guarantees with a higher dollar one, though I think your odds are better) but I'd hate to lose the buck of a lifetime because I cheaped out on gear. If you end up buying twice to replace something that won't do the job, you might as well have paid more to begin with, in my opinion.
 
I’ve never had an expensive scope. In my experience when you hit the $250 ballpark it is rugged, quite clear, and trouble free. I’ve only had Burris and Vortex in this ballpark.

The cheap ones can break or come defective brand new (bushnells I’ve had), or give a second rate user experience in some aspect. For example a friends cheap Simmons was garbage, my cheap Simmons works great on a 22 but it’s nothing to write home about.

It may just be that like me you’re satisfied with something that works well and doesn’t break and is clear, while paying vastly more for incremental improvement is not pertinent to your (or my) particular application.

It’s cool to have a Ferrari but it functions the same in a school zone as a Tercel.
The tercel will outperform a ferrari in terms of utlity and reliability, unlike cheap scopes.

That said, I have some rimfire bushnell scopes on .22 gopher guns, and they work fine at that. Also no big loss if it breaks because I would have at least one more rifle in the vehicle on a day long shoot. I am more particular about big game rifle scopes.
 
Although if 90% of guys don’t shoot enough or far enough they may never need warranty and having to send back all the time for the other guys they learn quicker than most what brands to steer clear of. Warranty is nice but not having to use it even nicer.

How many of the 90% are shooting scopes that don’t track accurately or retain zero and get by anyway? No idea they are sittin on a scope that for another guy would already be sent back for warranty?
 
The tercel will outperform a ferrari in terms of utlity and reliability, unlike cheap scopes.

That said, I have some rimfire bushnell scopes on .22 gopher guns, and they work fine at that. Also no big loss if it breaks because I would have at least one more rifle in the vehicle on a day long shoot. I am more particular about big game rifle scopes.
Idk swfa made cheap scopes that tracked and held zero. Leupold mark 4 fixed power same=tracked and held zero and they were reasonably priced.

What people want sells=stupid illumination, retarded zoom rations and crappy for hunting reticles.

Nightforce could own the hunting segment if they offered better reticles.

Leupold knows how to make a reliable scope that tracks and holds zero yet they refuse to.

SWFA dosent have any product in stock and hasn’t for years

Bring back fixed 6x with steel tube and German #4 or some thing like the thlr reticle minox has is a reasonably sized zoom and they’d do most everything you’d need or want but it wouldn’t be cool.
 
When I was in Alberta this summer at a long range shooting course, I had the chance to look through a Leupold Mark V and compare it to my Apex Rival.

My Apex is clear enough to see paint chips on steel at 1000m, (fuzzy, but doable), but the Leupold is even more clear. I can see why they use them on the course rifles.

Big price difference though!
 
Although if 90% of guys don’t shoot enough or far enough they may never need warranty and having to send back all the time for the other guys they learn quicker than most what brands to steer clear of. Warranty is nice but not having to use it even nicer.

How many of the 90% are shooting scopes that don’t track accurately or retain zero and get by anyway? No idea they are sittin on a scope that for another guy would already be sent back for warranty?

That makes sense, a guy hunting out to 250 yards does not really need or want a long range precision scope and might just set and forget the turrets once it's sighted in for their needs.

The other big variable are people's eye sight, it's not hard for me to imagine that some people can get buy with less quality optics and make it work, specially if they are not as you point out trying to shoot longer distances and dialing different ranges looking for small groups.
 
Idk swfa made cheap scopes that tracked and held zero. Leupold mark 4 fixed power same=tracked and held zero and they were reasonably priced.

What people want sells=stupid illumination, retarded zoom rations and crappy for hunting reticles.

Nightforce could own the hunting segment if they offered better reticles.

Leupold knows how to make a reliable scope that tracks and holds zero yet they refuse to.

SWFA dosent have any product in stock and hasn’t for years

Bring back fixed 6x with steel tube and German #4 or some thing like the thlr reticle minox has is a reasonably sized zoom and they’d do most everything you’d need or want but it wouldn’t be cool.
Some good points. I’m about to pop my nightforce cherry with an nx8 1-8 capped dmx, it’s mounted just need the cold snap to lift. But correct there’s maybe handful of current production hunt friendly options that pass the track and durability stuff. I think the trend will improve in this direction though as it seems to be starting. Credo 1-10 new, the atacr would work, the new maven rs6 just announced looks to have potential. We’ve heard about the maven rs1 but I see it as more of a longer range optic than a midrange with its 15x top end, unsure when the reticle becomes useable. Agree nightforce needs to get that dmx reticle into more models.

I follow a guy down south who’s cleaning up prs stuff with mark v and he laughs at the internet re how many Leupold mark v’s are being used at the top. So that Leupold topic a bit of an enigma to watch out for, something fishy there. I’m setting up another rig with a vx5hd I’ll see how it tracks out etc, damn nice scope! Listen to net though and...well the story gets weird.

It is hard to find it all though. Like midrange or say to 1000 with good glass do you really need parallax adjust step and mags over 10x for hunt set ups? Seems another step worth eliminating to me. Also I do not get reticle and dialling solutions. Pick one. But a dialling turret on a reticle should follow maven rs6 path, not too obtrusive but also locking and zero stopping. Reticle options otherwise need to be capped and 100% of time windage capped.
And going much further you seem to hear lots of desire for usable reticles in the 6x-8x range. I agree and now see benefit of ffp here as I can’t see to dial so going to 14x on an sfp really works best on the range.

On top of this we have other hunt features often overlooked. Snag free less tactical profiles. We slide our guns into things, Kifaru gun bearers, the rifle side down profile is a thing for me, don’t want some parallax and illum dink sticking into my ribs or holding the gun up every time I set it on something. This is where the vx5hd comes to mind, sleeker smoother hunt friendly envelopes. Trijicon and even nightforce could take some lessons there for hunt focus products as it is different than military and law enforcement type envelopes imo. Maven seems paying attention in the rs6 and rs1 but on the rs1 they need to add a mil reticle and the rs1.2 has it but adds illum on top of the parallax and it just went to a nope for me with that dink stickin out. The rs1 is capped too but dialler on the 1.2.

I’ve sort of stumbled into the nx8 as I’m at the point of fighting reading glasses for little stuff on the gun or turrets or charts so my solutions plan is ballistic rangefinder which you can focus to your eye and then A reticle based solution which you can also focus. So I’m now in the ffp mil game by accident if you will. I can already tell we will get along just fine and I’ll likely end up glad it is mil in the less is more sense for speed and simplicity for hunting which is my only care.

Excited to get going and see the value in eliminating the middle steps of going between a rangefinder and a scope. Seems I get my two scopes in one from jump shooting whitetail with a red dot or blood trailing or camp bear set up etc to could leave it on 5x and do it all as the reticle is usable there. That’s true 0-midrange versatile. And it’s compact to suit the little 308 I have and will carry a long time now so it’s looking like I have found the yin to that rifles yang and for no reading glasses goals.

I bet we see some other good options coming out of 2025 shot show and beyond heading this direction.

Pricy though if you want etched glass reticles that can’t be phased by magnification changes in poi and durability and then proper tough and accurate internals etc. Cant say I’ve seen anything else like the little nx8. The 34mm options (atacr credo rs6) would be next in line but a bit too long and heavy to suit my little short action lightweight 308, the nx8 just fits, it would likely be too short to get over a long action and stay in the rings without an extended ring or full length rail though so would have to look at those longer heavier 3 options. Unless full length rail mounting then nx8 will fit whatever. It’s a bunch of scope for 17 oz.

I think things are looking up in these directions.

Not sure the straight tube needs to be for the hunt options either. I’m guessing market capture for the gas guns is why they still keep with the lpvo profile but in reality take the 30mm guts and run low power 1-10x range with 36-42mm objectives with hunt usable ffp reticles with or without illumination will be coming. And get all the other design features looked at also. Most of them I think I’ve captured above but maybe I’m still missing a couple points they need to get right.

My nx8 without illum would appeal but the donut of death would need to be bigger in diameter and thicker. And maybe I won’t like the .2 mil per click on zeroing? Some say go atacr for the .1 mil per click but on my build and range hopes I don’t think it will matter. For diallers though it would and the atacr is exposed dialler with zero stop and .1 mil per click if anyone shopping this stuff.

Was fun getting back up to speed on the latest gear. Brief time with sig kilo 5/6k ballistic rangefinders is eye opening. Powerhouse rangefinders spitting instant solutions with applied ballistics engine and onboard atmospherics seem game changer to me.

It’s been interesting watch the ffp mil fad come around to the hunters realizing the prs stuff has limitations for hunting, almost as if it’s two different games ;), and now looking for the best of what that gear offers translated over to best of (less is more to be faster etc) hunting focused solutions and envelopes. You can tell now where the future is headed and it’s lookin good for hunters to take advantage of these new-ish developments. Eventually minimizing all the trade offs up to recently and still only handful of currently available options but still some ways to go yet.
 
I'm doing long range precision and shorter-range similar games at a range, so what works for me is to wear my reading glasses and be able to see scope knobs and 4DOF and other things close up, and have the scope dialed so I can see what's downrange through it clearly with my aging eyes and those glasses even though it's a bit hazy otherwise.

Progressive lenses have an issue with seeing the reticle, since it's close up and especially in the prone position you're looking through the distance part of the lens.

But if you're hunting then I'd think you'd want to be aware of what's around you in the great outdoors and able to glass things without pointing a rifle at them, so regular glasses and binoculars or a spotting scope become necessary.
 
Have a couple of 30-35yr old Leupold's that have never given me any issues, they've taken a beating with falling over, one got run over, been slapped against trees on a horse, never changed zero, both on old style Weaver rings. Have an old Nkon 6.5-20, 1/8MOA clicks, about 30yrs old, likely 20K+ shots on it, no issues. I found that the Zeiss Conquest MC and Swaro Z3 had better glass, so have switched to buying the Z3 as that original version Zeiss is discontinued, can't speak to the V4, haven't tried it out, same mfgr, LOW in Japan.
Bought Tract Toric, Delta Stryker gen2 and Sightron S-TAC over the last few yrs too, no issues with them, those 3 are FFP range scopes, Sightron isn't the same quality glass, thicker reticle, but, was 1K cheaper than the other two., glass between the Tract and Delta are a tossup, Tract has nicer turrets. I think once you crack the 2500.00 mark these days, you get some diminishing returns.
I bought a Z3 and a Leupold VX3 at the same time to see which one was better, kept the Swaro, no contest.
 
Back
Top Bottom