Hello everyone! I recently bought a 1895 Chilean Mauser Carbine that I suspect may be a Boer Mauser. I have been doing a bit of research on several different forum web sites but I am still fifty, fifty on whether this rifle made it to South Africa.
However there are some things that this rifle has going for it and the main thing is that the receiver never had a crest stamped on it, and that the serial number B9564 falls in to the Chilean contract rifles that were sent to South Africa but never made it threw the blockade. Another interesting thing on this rifle is that some one has removed the side sling mount and installed it under the butt stock for personal preference and left his initials on the blank spot where the sling mount went.
There is no proving its the initials of a Boer but you can tell the modification was done a long time ago. The main thing that has me not 100% sure whether this was used in Africa is the fact that it has Mauser Chileno on the side receiver. My understanding is that if this rifle was sent back it should have the Chilean crest on it. Is it possible that this one got threw which would explain why there is no crest?
I have posted some pictures of the rifle and would love to hear some opinions and thoughts on this subject, I find the information on Boer Mausers to be all over the place with lots of contradiction but its very interesting never the less. Thanks for looking.
[/url]
[/url]
[url=http://imgur.com/nTgimad]
However there are some things that this rifle has going for it and the main thing is that the receiver never had a crest stamped on it, and that the serial number B9564 falls in to the Chilean contract rifles that were sent to South Africa but never made it threw the blockade. Another interesting thing on this rifle is that some one has removed the side sling mount and installed it under the butt stock for personal preference and left his initials on the blank spot where the sling mount went.
There is no proving its the initials of a Boer but you can tell the modification was done a long time ago. The main thing that has me not 100% sure whether this was used in Africa is the fact that it has Mauser Chileno on the side receiver. My understanding is that if this rifle was sent back it should have the Chilean crest on it. Is it possible that this one got threw which would explain why there is no crest?
I have posted some pictures of the rifle and would love to hear some opinions and thoughts on this subject, I find the information on Boer Mausers to be all over the place with lots of contradiction but its very interesting never the less. Thanks for looking.





Last edited: