All shooters should at least learn to reload, hunters or not! All firearms owners should belong to a club, I don't care if they use it or not, I just want the money in the club to improve the range for them when they do decide to use it.
I was able to get the practice we used to have at our range of allowing "Hunters" to purchase a 1 day non escorted pass for $20.00 to Zero their rifles. They now must either have a membership ($138.00 for a family) or be signed in by a member, $10.00 day pass. If these ranges are not supported then they will cease to exist.
If the "Average hunter" learns to reload, joins a club and uses the range more often we have a couple of benefits, 1. more people in the sport and using the ranges/clubs, 2. Less wounded animals due to lack of proper shooting skills.
Handloading not only provides a source for perhaps less expensive ammunition but opens up a whole world of new people to sit and have a coffee with to discuss your new load and what works best with xyz powder in such and such a calibre.
Belonging to a club/range gives you a place to shoot yes, but far more important it give you a place to learn. New hunters can receive fantastic instruction and encouragement once they belong to a club/range. You can shoot your whole life and never get better that you are right now, or you can join a club and find a mentor and be directed to try it a little bit differently and improve.
When the CFO's of the country made it manditory to have a club membership to transfer a handgun/restricted weapon they didn't realize what they were doing. Now every person who wants to buy such a gun must belong to a range that means more range members, larger voice, more letters and phone calls to various MP's and more poop rolling down hill to the CFO's, poop that they don't want when they have to explain to the minister why certian people have not received answers to letters they wrote some 6 months previous!
Yes, the average hunter should handload and belong to a gun club with a range attached suitable for shooting at the ranges he wishes to zero at.
Scott
I was able to get the practice we used to have at our range of allowing "Hunters" to purchase a 1 day non escorted pass for $20.00 to Zero their rifles. They now must either have a membership ($138.00 for a family) or be signed in by a member, $10.00 day pass. If these ranges are not supported then they will cease to exist.
If the "Average hunter" learns to reload, joins a club and uses the range more often we have a couple of benefits, 1. more people in the sport and using the ranges/clubs, 2. Less wounded animals due to lack of proper shooting skills.
Handloading not only provides a source for perhaps less expensive ammunition but opens up a whole world of new people to sit and have a coffee with to discuss your new load and what works best with xyz powder in such and such a calibre.
Belonging to a club/range gives you a place to shoot yes, but far more important it give you a place to learn. New hunters can receive fantastic instruction and encouragement once they belong to a club/range. You can shoot your whole life and never get better that you are right now, or you can join a club and find a mentor and be directed to try it a little bit differently and improve.
When the CFO's of the country made it manditory to have a club membership to transfer a handgun/restricted weapon they didn't realize what they were doing. Now every person who wants to buy such a gun must belong to a range that means more range members, larger voice, more letters and phone calls to various MP's and more poop rolling down hill to the CFO's, poop that they don't want when they have to explain to the minister why certian people have not received answers to letters they wrote some 6 months previous!
Yes, the average hunter should handload and belong to a gun club with a range attached suitable for shooting at the ranges he wishes to zero at.
Scott