Well I am going to actually argue in favour of the 180B. And I do this with very much experience with the 15 and a fair bit with the 180B:
a. The 15 is cast aluminum, wich is WEAK. I have seen an entire row of these weapons abliterated by some idiot telling recruits to lay them down lined up in a parking lot and then an even bigger idion running over them with his sunfire. I have seen steel stand up to far worse abuse than that many times; and even straight up polymer (namely in the famed glock torture tests) has passed that torture and more.
b. even though the 180's lower is polymer, the upper is STEEL. i have found that when it comes to rough handling the steel upper will take most of the abuse away from the polymer (and take it well)
c. Though I have not actually disected a 180B to this extent, if you look in the Armalite web page they claim the polymer lower receiver is steel reinforced. I'm trying to figure out how to get the image on this post, but I'm fairly computer illiterate so if anyone cares enought to tell me how please write me and I'll stick it in here.
d. I must decline my argument in terms of the barrel, but remember, that is dependant on what AR15 model you are comparing it against. not all 15 barrels have been peachy either.
e. The 180 uses a piston instead of shooting gases directly into the receiver and bolt assembly, which adds to reliability; and to me reliability is what toughness is all about.
I'm propably going to get railed on for not siding with the all-mighty AR15, but my opinion is my own and untill i see first hand to show me otherwise, this is what I'll stick with
--------------------------------------------------------------------
die standing and go down swingin