foxbat said:You pay a significant premium for the ubiquitous Picatinny rail and faster twist on the barrel for the Tactical over the regular Varmint..
Are those differences...ability to use non-Tikka rings, and to use heavier
bullets worth the 50% premium...you be the judge.
So the only rifle worth buying is a Savage?Steve David said:I wanted an out of the box rifle for shooting out to 300 yards. My top 2 choices were the Tikka Tactical 308 and the Savage 10FP McMillan, and althought that Tikka action was smoot as silk, it just could not out match the A2 stock on the Savage, also, the Savage is about $500.00 cheaper.
I bought mine before I knew the joys of gunnutz and all the custom Canadian gunmakers. My Rem 700 is good enough for my shooting and I got it cheap.alberta tactical rifle said:For what the Tikka sells for, you are so close to the cost of a custom that, a)really fits the shooter, and b) really shoots well, why not save up a few more bucks and get something truly unique?
UncleWalther said:Is the barrel on the tactical of a different or higher quality than the barrel on the standard varmint model?
Danny Boy said:The Tactical has a shorter barrel and looks a little different. I assume it is made of better quality since you are paying 50% extra $$ overall. No idea how much better it is.
Danny
Shelldrake said:Yes.
......................
nashorn said:What is the barrel length on the varmint? My .223 Tac. has a 24 inch barrel so I doubt the varmint is longer than that. Does the varmint have a heavy barrel as well? That might be the other difference since the Tac has a heavy barrel and is threaded for a muzzle break or silencer.