Is there a list of which bull-pup guns are LEGAL to own (restricted or non) in canada

So this essentially is converting a gun into a bullpup is prohibited as stated by previous replies, ya?

No. Simply owning a bullpup stock is illegal. The stock itself is prohibited, with or without a gun attached to it. It does not change the actual classification of the firearm, unless of course the combination of the two moves it from the non-restricted to restricted category due to overall length. Then you'd have an unregistered restricted firearm, and be in possession of a prohibited device. If the overall length still fell within the Non-restricted category, you'd simply be in possession of a prohibited device, if in possession of a PAL of course.

In the case of the sks, and the sks bullpup stock, the sks rifle itself would not become prohibited.


I'm just curious what guns you can convert from a normal into a bullpup... I obviously don't want to do it, as I don't want illegal guns in my life; but am curious as to how this would work if it were allowed, like if I lived in the states or something...

In Canada, all bull pup stocks are illegal, so there are no firearms that you can convert to bullpup, as the required parts to do so are prohibited devices. In the states it would depend on federal and state laws, depending on where you live. If you were allowed, it would be as simple as buying the stock, and putting the barrelled receiver into it. It is just a stock, after all.

The only bullpups we can have here, are firearms that as part of their design are in a bullpup configuration. The Tavor, Type 97, M17s etc are not placed into "stocks" to make them bullpups, so they themselves are legal.

Groovy eh how the law screws ya.
 
Last edited:
No. Simply owning a bullpup stock is illegal. The stock itself is prohibited, with or without a gun attached to it. It does not change the actual classification of the firearm, unless of course the combination of the two moves it from the non-restricted to restricted category due to overall length. Then you'd have an unregistered restricted firearm, and be in possession of a prohibited device. If the overall length still fell within the Non-restricted category, you'd simply be in possession of a prohibited device, if in possession of a PAL of course.

In the case of the sks, and the sks bullpup stock, the sks rifle itself would not become prohibited.




In Canada, all bull pup stocks are illegal, so there are no firearms that you can convert to bullpup, as the required parts to do so are prohibited devices. In the states it would depend on federal and state laws, depending on where you live. If you were allowed, it would be as simple as buying the stock, and putting the barrelled receiver into it. It is just a stock, after all.

The only bullpups we can have here, are firearms that as part of their design are in a bullpup configuration. The Tavor, Type 97, M17s etc are not placed into "stocks" to make them bullpups, so they themselves are legal.

Groovy eh how the law screws ya.

Ahh I see how it works now; Thanks for the solid info man! But yes, I'd have to agree. We gotta loosen up the laws in Canada... If only.
 
There's stocks that exist for the 10/22, SKS, and Mosin Nagant to make them bullpup, but those are Stateside only.

Shame, some of those look pretty awesome. In that format, I'd get an SKS; I really don't see the draw to them otherwise. Kind of an ugly rifle on it's own. Not sure why.. Just looks... cheap.
 
And dont ask why the tavor is non restricted while the Aug (practically identical rifle) is prohibited... Thems the rules.

I was pretty sad to hear I couldn't get an AUG.

Think they'll ever re-visit making some of these available in Canada again? Or once it's prohib, that's it for that gun for good?
 
And dont ask why the tavor is non restricted while the Aug (practically identical rifle) is prohibited... Thems the rules.

Ha well the Tavor is nothing close to the AUG as far as design. The only reason the Tavor and FS2000 etc are legal is because they hadn't been invented when the Firearms Act came into effect - they only prohibited what was around at that time.
 
And dont ask why the tavor is non restricted while the Aug (practically identical rifle) is prohibited... Thems the rules.

Because the AUG was around when the politicians decided it looked scary, and they named it as a prohibited gun.

The Tavor didn't exist yet, and the silly politicians wrote the "bullpup" ban with a bunch of extra words they thought sounded really good at banning bullpups, but in the end screwed them and helped us.

Thusly, we have the Tavor and friends.
 
Because the AUG was around when the politicians decided it looked scary, and they named it as a prohibited gun.

The aug was used in a high profile armed robbery (armored truck). Gun laws in Canada are often reactions to events and are not well thought out.
 
Back
Top Bottom