I think it's great that you guys are doing what you are doing but to be 100% honest, I shoot Glocks. I am totally on board with cookie cutter guns. I care that they work. But for me, ARs are pretty much interchangeable on every level except quality.I guess the bottom line is that if we wanted to toe the line and make just another AR we could have. But why? We had the opportunity to strike out on our own a little, nothing serious, it's still an AR, but we went with it. In the end another forged AR with the same plastic hanging off it is the same as all the rest.. it just has a different name on it.
If you like a KAC gun, get a KAC ..
If you like a LMT gun, get a LMT..
..If you like a NEA gun, get a NEA.
Everyone has different preferences, why try and change that? I'd rather people liked our gun for what it is and not because it's the same as someone else's..
There are some great gun makers out there and there are a lot more cookie cutter ones. We hope to one day be along side those ones that decide to take the chances and make some products that aren't the norm. But we understand that the great ones are the ones doing this, and the cookie cutters are still sitting in the bakery..
I only care about getting a Noveske or a Centurion if they DO something other guns don't do. And I would be the first person to admit that in my hands, a Noveske or Centurion probably wouldn't do all that much better than a rack grade M4.
Others may (and I assume do) feel differently. But for me personally, the goal is to get a rifle with a FF rail that has reliability and durability on par with Colt or DD or LMT or a good Stag.
But obviously if "doing things a little differently" is part of what makes your business run, I'm hardly going to advise otherwise. I'm just commenting on my own priorities as a shooter.


















































