I've lost respect

Cdn303

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
47   0   1
Location
Bruce County, On
So, I've come across this video, and now I've lost respect for Lee Emery. BBe careful when watching it, you may find yourself screaming at your computer, I did.

[youtube]PsDLjfA1Ylw[/youtube]

Before the show, someone on the crew could have done a quick google search. 30-06 first cartridge with smokeless powder - NO :mad:. Garand is the longest serving military rifle - NO :mad:. And so on and so forth.
 
The american have to win all the time, same old story, i am not sure he would have won againt my SVT-40... JP.
 
Haha - it's tv. Much like the internet, if you begin to take it seriously you're doomed. Their primary viewership is not known for anything other than their rabid americanism, so it doesn't overly surprise me. I enjoy watching all the same.
 
That was great. Lee was playing it up for the show, as he stated. I would like to see the SVT-40 against the Garand too.
 
For the record:

.30-'06 (Cal. .30, M1906) was the THIRD smokeless-powder design actually adopted as their Service cartridge by the USA. FIRST was the almost-forgotten .30-40 Krag which just happened to use a charge of 40 grains of the stuff. Then there was the .30-'03 which they have managed to forget completely. This was shortened 1/10 of an inch and the 220 replaced with a 150 to give the .30-'06.

Strictly for the record, now, France adopted a smokeless-powder cartridge in 1886, Germany in 1888, Spain in 1892, Italy in 1891, Holland in 1893, Denmark in 1889, Belgium in 1889, Argentina in 1891, Austria-Hungary in 1890, Great Britain in 1892. It must be noted that both Austria-Hungary and Great Britain had smokless-powder ammunition under development in 1888, but issued ammo with compressed blackpowder charges as an interim measure. The .30-'06 came along about 15 years after most of these...... and well after the .30-30WCF was introduced with the 1894 Winchester.

General George Patton DID term the M-1 Garand rifle (designed by a Canadian, which they like to forget) as "the greatest combat implement ever devised". General George Patton also referred to himself as the reincarnation of Julius Caesar, who is well known to classicists to have believed that he was the reincarnation of Alexander the Great.

Oh well, when you have the three greatest generals in all history in your front line, at the same time and eating only one set of K-rations, I guess the truth can be ignored.
.
 
Did you happen to see Son's of Guns episode were the "arms expert" claimed a 38 Arisaka had no safety and was too weak for full powered loads............half witts.....Harold
 
Meh, The Yanks always showed up late for the party. Be it WWI or WWII, who cares how good your rifle is if you're not there to use it?

;)
 
Meh, The Yanks always showed up late for the party. Be it WWI or WWII, who cares how good your rifle is if you're not there to use it?

;)

WWII was won because of the yanks and russians "it sucks to say it, but the UK was pretty screwed if they were left on there own"
 
I was going for jingoistic hyperbole, not accuracy. :p

I remember reading somewhere that the Red Army knocked down around 150 ish German divisions and the Western Allies 70 ish combined.

So I guess that makes the Mosin Nagant the best battle implement ever devised.

That or having #### loads of T-34's
 
How so lol

M1

-is faster to load
-is more accurate
-has a better knock down power
-has a longer effective range

I could load my SKS (assuming original 10 rd mag) as quickly as an MI garand and would only need to reload once to hit 20 plates. Rate of fire with SKS is faster due to lower recoil thus faster sight/target acquisition.

At the distance they were shooting those huge targets, which I estimate to be no more than 100 meters (probably much less than that), the SKS is accurate enough and has enough power to break ceramic plates:D just the same as a Garand or LE.

So based on the shooting parameters in the video, yes the SKS will win hands down.
 
Back
Top Bottom