There's something about a tough, simple reliable, design even on a simple day hunting trip that I just love, now I may be biased since I spend a lot more time in the "main battle rifles" and "red rifles" section on here and I know im posting this in the hunting and sporting arms where those folks like to hang out however, the rifle the OP posted is a semi auto so the obvious "hunting" rifles to compare it too are the Remington 750 rifles, the benelli R1, the Browning Bar and similar
the problem is i have yet to have/see any good experiences with modern hunting semi autos. i had a rem 7400, I could not get it to fire more than 3 rounds without a jam. , fail to feed, fail to eject i now use my CZ when i want a semi auto in the bush.
Other folks in my hunting party had similar semi autos and all of them had problems every year.
However one guy had a rusty beat up SKS and it was trouble free year after year.
I don't understand how 800-1200$ guns are unreliable when we can have SKS rifles or Norc M305s for a fraction of the cost with a fraction of the maintence and have less issues. the fit and finish is defiantly less so it must be a design difference.
Agreed the rifle the OP posted is a big heavy PIG im sure its also tough and reliable as dirt. and simple to maintain in the field. this has to count for something, not every hunting trip around the world is a "clean gun for 3 hours, transport gun in clean shiny case, remove gun from case while being careful not to get it damp or dusty while entering your covered tree stand wait for 8 hours, go home and re-clean gun for next day" type hunting trip
oh, and awesome pics above!