Just bought a No.4 Mk1. Should be arriving any day now. My first enfield so I am very excited. Sporter'd with matching numbers. Can't wait to head to the range...I'm going the day I get it, whether its -20 or not...lol
Looks like the barrel was cut off and resleeved. Very nice find. The barrel bob and resleeve was quite common for a while when they were still cheap and plentiful. Many were in great condition externally but the bores were rusted out.
Nice to have one as a shooter.
My first Lee-Enfield is a N.Z.-marked No.2 Mk. IV* .22 calibre trainer.
I know little about Lee-Enfields but here's what I can tell you about this one. It's built on a 1910 Enfield No. 1 Mk. III
![]()
Butt socket, on both sides and stock disk have the N^Z stamp. The mix of markings on both sides of the butt socket are unlike any others I've seen, so I'd love to hear from others that have rifles with similar markings.
![]()
![]()
Serial # on the butt socket, which as you can see is stamped into the stock as well, is different than the number on the receiver, the nosecap and the forestock.
The cutoff is gone, but the volley sights are in place.
The fact that it's mismatched doesn't bother me at all. It looks the part. All I was looking for was a Lee-Enfield to harken back to my days in cadets and give my son a chance to experience one, and to keep my DND .22 ammunition box company. As long as it hits where I aim it, it will fit the bill nicely.
![]()
Hey Klunk, I'll have to send you some updated photos of the rest of the collection, thanks for posting them.
C96
Your attachment screw isn't original Cantom, it should be a looped swivel screw.
I've had several of these guns (still have one) and what you describe is typical. After all, volley sights are useless with a .22



























