Just for fun, build me a custom rifle.

Because it's a push feed, I would go the full route and spend alot of cash.

I'd go with a decent bedded factory stock and a 270/280/30-06/35Whelen bbl, Weaver mounts, Burris rings and a 2x7 leupold.


.
 
Well, that sucks. You say it's a long-action but with short-action guts (mag box/follower etc)?

If you don't mind getting new guts I'd swap for long-action internals and go with a 280 AI with a 26" tube. Set it up with a heavier barrel the way Sako used to (magnum contour for the 30-06 family) and finish it with a good synthetic (hunting) stock. Cerakote the works and away you go.

If you're stuck on a short action case, build it into a 308 with a 24" heavy barrel and a McMillan M40 stock. This is what our ERT Snipers use and they do a damned fine job.

Either of those grab you?
 
This one is in the dreaming/parts collecting stage and would work with your action too-

-Tweaked LH M70 Classic w/ Williams extractor (just have the factory bang switch worked down to 3 poundsish, the old M70 trigger can't be beat on a hunting rig IMO)
-22" 30-06 chambered SS Featherweight contour (Pacnor?)
-Brown Compact McMillan Edge w/ blind mag
-VX3 2.5-8 in Talley LW lows

Should be around 7 pounds ready to hunt...
 
Short action would be .284win, .338Fed, or .358win. .284 would get a 24" stainless barrel, the other two would be 22". McMillan M70 Featherweight.

Long action would be the same barrel, stock, but in .280 or .338-06...
 
Last edited:
-6.5x55
-20" Pac-Nor #6 Fluted Barrel finished at 20"
-McMillan M40 HTG Stock
-Elite 6500 2.5-16x42mm
-Warne Bases and TPS Rings

This is what I'm building except my M70 is a short action so will be a .260 Rem instead of the 6.5x55.
 
the not so common 8mm Rem Mag
sako AV action
24" pac-nor barrel
brown precision synthetic
7&3/4 lbs ready to go.
 
It's funny. I've owned push feed and controlled feed rifles of many flavours: Mauser, Winchester, Remington, Ruger, Tikka and probably several others I cannot remember. I have never had a cartridge fail to chamber or eject. I've never had a bolt action rifle bind or jam. I've cycled a 700 upside down just to see if I could. I will never understand where this whole argument over PF vs CF comes from. I swear the majority of people arguing one type over the other has never tried anything else. CF and PF, both good in my books. :)
 
It's funny. I've owned push feed and controlled feed rifles of many flavours: Mauser, Winchester, Remington, Ruger, Tikka and probably several others I cannot remember. I have never had a cartridge fail to chamber or eject. I've never had a bolt action rifle bind or jam. I've cycled a 700 upside down just to see if I could. I will never understand where this whole argument over PF vs CF comes from. I swear the majority of people arguing one type over the other has never tried anything else. CF and PF, both good in my books. :)

I agree I just wonder why Winchester went back to controlled feed again :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom