JUST IN!!!!!!!!! E-Lander 10 Round AIA 308 Magazines.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Will these fit and function reliablely in a m305/m1a as well as the AIA?
Not asking about legalities etc., just fit and function, thanks for your time.
 
Chuckbuster said:
There was another thread that degenerated and got a little ugly that dealt with this subject. I don't want to rehash that thread, but, I am puzzled as to the (perceived?) 10 round limit as it applies to Lee Enfields. I thought they were specifically named as an exemption, not only that, but also as being a manually operated bolt action repeater. No??
Click to expand...

I highly suggest you download a copy of the firearms act and check out the section where it specifically deals with the enfield magazines. They are specifically listed with the 10 round exemption because those magazines also fit in the Charlton conversion (full auto lee enfield).
 
Just a couple of more pics of the magazines. Hope that helps a little more for some folks.

AIA5_zps7f5767d6.jpg

AIA6_zps76b98e2c.jpg
 
Wink wink, I got ya. Count me in. Just email the address? Cant find link to order online...

EDIT - Never mind. ORDERED Muahahah. You guys rule! Just to be clear, the emailed invoice will show the adjusted price for the 5-pack?
 
Last edited:
I'm no legal eagle and I find the language below very...confusing...but does it not mean that the LE is exempt from magazine restrictions?

Former Cartridge Magazine Control Regulations

3. (1) Any cartridge magazine
(a) that is capable of containing more than five cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed and that is designed or manufactured for use in
(i) a semi-automatic handgun that is not commonly available in Canada,
(ii) a semi-automatic firearm other than a semi-automatic handgun,
(iii) an automatic firearm whether or not it has been altered to discharge only one projectile with one pressure of the trigger,
(iv) the firearms of the designs commonly known as the Ingram M10 and M11 pistols, and any variants or modified versions of them, including the Cobray M10 and M11 pistols, the RPB M10, M11 and SM11 pistols and the SWD M10, M11, SM10 and SM11 pistols,
(v) the firearm of the design commonly known as the Partisan Avenger Auto Pistol, and any variant or modified version of it, or
(vi) the firearm of the design commonly known as the UZI pistol, and any variant or modified version of it, including the Micro-UZI pistol; or
(b) that is capable of containing more than 10 cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed and that is designed or manufactured for use in a semi-automatic handgun that is commonly available in Canada.
(2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not include any cartridge magazine that
(a) was originally designed or manufactured for use in a firearm that
(i) is chambered for, or designed to use, rimfire cartridges,
(ii) is a rifle of the type commonly known as the “Lee Enfield” rifle, where the magazine is capable of containing not more than 10 cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed, or
(iii) is commonly known as the U.S. Rifle M1 (Garand) including the Beretta M1 Garand rifle, the Breda M1 Garand rifle and the Springfield Armoury M1 Garand rifle;
(b) is not a reproduction and was originally designed or manufactured for use in a firearm that
(i) is commonly known as the Charlton Rifle,
(ii) is commonly known as the Farquhar-Hill Rifle, or
(iii) is commonly known as the Huot Automatic Rifle;

With my difficulties understanding the lawyer speak, it seems to me that from this, if LE mags over 10 are not permitted, then the M1 Garand is also prohibited. Again, I'm not trying to stir the pot, derail or argue, I'm just confused. Perhaps someone a little more versed in legalese could step in and provide a plain language explanation. And, I should add that if I could swing it right now, I'd grab some too...but I just bought a friend's over/under...special sales...always off guard for these things.
 
Chuckbuster said:
I'm no legal eagle and I find the language below very...confusing...but does it not mean that the LE is exempt from magazine restrictions?

Former Cartridge Magazine Control Regulations

3. (1) Any cartridge magazine
(a) that is capable of containing more than five cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed and that is designed or manufactured for use in
(i) a semi-automatic handgun that is not commonly available in Canada,
(ii) a semi-automatic firearm other than a semi-automatic handgun,
(iii) an automatic firearm whether or not it has been altered to discharge only one projectile with one pressure of the trigger,
(iv) the firearms of the designs commonly known as the Ingram M10 and M11 pistols, and any variants or modified versions of them, including the Cobray M10 and M11 pistols, the RPB M10, M11 and SM11 pistols and the SWD M10, M11, SM10 and SM11 pistols,
(v) the firearm of the design commonly known as the Partisan Avenger Auto Pistol, and any variant or modified version of it, or
(vi) the firearm of the design commonly known as the UZI pistol, and any variant or modified version of it, including the Micro-UZI pistol; or
(b) that is capable of containing more than 10 cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed and that is designed or manufactured for use in a semi-automatic handgun that is commonly available in Canada.
(2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not include any cartridge magazine that
(a) was originally designed or manufactured for use in a firearm that
(i) is chambered for, or designed to use, rimfire cartridges,
(ii) is a rifle of the type commonly known as the “Lee Enfield” rifle, where the magazine is capable of containing not more than 10 cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed, or
(iii) is commonly known as the U.S. Rifle M1 (Garand) including the Beretta M1 Garand rifle, the Breda M1 Garand rifle and the Springfield Armoury M1 Garand rifle;
(b) is not a reproduction and was originally designed or manufactured for use in a firearm that
(i) is commonly known as the Charlton Rifle,
(ii) is commonly known as the Farquhar-Hill Rifle, or
(iii) is commonly known as the Huot Automatic Rifle;

With my difficulties understanding the lawyer speak, it seems to me that from this, if LE mags over 10 are not permitted, then the M1 Garand is also prohibited. Again, I'm not trying to stir the pot, derail or argue, I'm just confused. Perhaps someone a little more versed in legalese could step in and provide a plain language explanation. And, I should add that if I could swing it right now, I'd grab some too...but I just bought a friend's over/under...special sales...always off guard for these things.
Click to expand...

Hope that helps
 
Chuckbuster said:
I'm no legal eagle and I find the language below very...confusing...but does it not mean that the LE is exempt from magazine restrictions?

Former Cartridge Magazine Control Regulations

3. (1) Any cartridge magazine
(a) that is capable of containing more than five cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed and that is designed or manufactured for use in
(i) a semi-automatic handgun that is not commonly available in Canada,
(ii) a semi-automatic firearm other than a semi-automatic handgun,
(iii) an automatic firearm whether or not it has been altered to discharge only one projectile with one pressure of the trigger,
(iv) the firearms of the designs commonly known as the Ingram M10 and M11 pistols, and any variants or modified versions of them, including the Cobray M10 and M11 pistols, the RPB M10, M11 and SM11 pistols and the SWD M10, M11, SM10 and SM11 pistols,
(v) the firearm of the design commonly known as the Partisan Avenger Auto Pistol, and any variant or modified version of it, or
(vi) the firearm of the design commonly known as the UZI pistol, and any variant or modified version of it, including the Micro-UZI pistol; or
(b) that is capable of containing more than 10 cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed and that is designed or manufactured for use in a semi-automatic handgun that is commonly available in Canada.
(2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not include any cartridge magazine that
(a) was originally designed or manufactured for use in a firearm that
(i) is chambered for, or designed to use, rimfire cartridges,
(ii) is a rifle of the type commonly known as the “Lee Enfield” rifle, where the magazine is capable of containing not more than 10 cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed, or
(iii) is commonly known as the U.S. Rifle M1 (Garand) including the Beretta M1 Garand rifle, the Breda M1 Garand rifle and the Springfield Armoury M1 Garand rifle;
(b) is not a reproduction and was originally designed or manufactured for use in a firearm that
(i) is commonly known as the Charlton Rifle,
(ii) is commonly known as the Farquhar-Hill Rifle, or
(iii) is commonly known as the Huot Automatic Rifle;

With my difficulties understanding the lawyer speak, it seems to me that from this, if LE mags over 10 are not permitted, then the M1 Garand is also prohibited. Again, I'm not trying to stir the pot, derail or argue, I'm just confused. Perhaps someone a little more versed in legalese could step in and provide a plain language explanation. And, I should add that if I could swing it right now, I'd grab some too...but I just bought a friend's over/under...special sales...always off guard for these things.
Click to expand...

This is saying any lee enfield magazine that holds 10 OR LESS is LEGAL, anything that holds more is not. It also states that any one designed for the GARAND is legal.
If you have more questions on this, please start a new thread, as this really is not the thread for this.
 
Plain and simple, the m1 garand is allowed the 8 rounds it was designed for and the lee enfield family et al is allowed the 10 round it was designed for, they are the noted exemptions. This is fact not debatable. M1garands with 8 round enbloc is non restricted semi auto, lee enfields in bolt action 10 round mag are non restricted.
 
mr83g0n3 said:
Hope that helps
Click to expand...

Hmmm...I think the real confusion stems from:

(2) Paragraph (1)(a) does not include any cartridge magazine that...

...or is it this bit that merely exempts an LE magazine (which would fit a Charlton conversion, should one miraculously turn up:rolleyes:, and present society with mortal danger...) from having to comply with the 5 round rule (thus saving our mortal souls from eternal damnation:rolleyes:) for auto loaders? And then of course the section you highlighted would provide a caveat of not exceeding ten rounds? Do I have the correct (and very tortuously Canadian) reasoning?

ETA: I just saw your previous post and will end here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom