KAC Triple Tap Really Worth the Money?

There is no doubt that they are putting out some great products.

However when compared to the other muzzle brakes and compensators available, are you saying that the $470 price tag is 3x or 4x "worth it" over others?

If so, which criteria are you going off from?
Click to expand...


What I posted was in reference to the "and we hate you" comment, not the TT vs other products on the market.


In regards to the TT vs others?

It's like asking what's the best race car?

For F1, Nascar, Rally, endurance, Dakar, drag etc? or is it for taking to the local track to better your own times?

What is your budget and application?


They choose to make the TT out of a ubber hard metal that is super hard to cut and work with and it reflects in the price tag. But how does that make it so much better for us common folks who can't use suppressors?
Click to expand...


A large number of products that were designed for military and LE applications are available for civilian sales, for example some of the flexible solar panels we sell.

They were never designed to be the best for common folk use, they were designed for specific purposes.
 
"High speed" ?

You'll need as much KAC as you can get to max out your high speed low drag maneuvers, any operator knows that.
 
GunfighterAlpha said:
In the process of building a "spared no expense, high speed" system ... My question is, is the Triple Tap REALLY that effective for the price?
Click to expand...

I really think it's time to revisit the original post. The question wasn't which compensator offers the best value, but is the TT effective for the price? (since this was intended as a "spared no expense" project). The answer is yes. The higher cost can be attributed to the material and additional labour in producing it. Does this make it better than a Battlecomp? Yes. Does it justify the difference in price? Not necessarily.

It's also important to remember that the Triple Tap is both a brake and compensator while also providing decent flash reduction.
 
BenL said:
But how does that make it so much better for us common folks who can't use suppressors?
Click to expand...

It doesn't. The inconel is used specifically to handle the abrasive conditions inside a can. Other than the extreme LCF - there is really no application that makes sense other than suppressed use.
 
Farmboy said:
What I posted was in reference to the "and we hate you" comment, not the TT vs other products on the market.
.
Click to expand...

"HK: Because you suck, and we hate you
KAC: We'll see your "suck", and raise you 20% more hate."

Hahahahah

I predominately only purchase HK & KAC products now.........
 
Since no one else has anything earth shattering to ad, I'll just say that it makes your black rifle look 100% scarier. ;)

tavor-star.jpg
 
agilent_one said:
It doesn't. The inconel is used specifically to handle the abrasive conditions inside a can. Other than the extreme LCF - there is really no application that makes sense other than suppressed use.
Click to expand...
Not exactly true. Single baffle comps have a tendency to wear very quickly on short barreled rifles. If you are a high round count shooter, that uses a compensator on your SBR, then the TT may actually be worth the money as it won't wear nearly as fast as a conventional brake.
 
This is true as well. I have a couple of Noveske KX-1's on short AR's and it is almost mind numbing how fast they will eat up that inner baffle during high round count shooting. I realize they are not really a brake per se, but you get the idea.
 
Its going on a 16" barrel attached to a VLTOR upper. What I was trying to say, is that if it mitigates muzzle rise almost entirely, than to me, it would be worth the cost. If the Battlecomp or others do the same thing, then why the hell would I pay x4 the price for a TT.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom