Good timing on this question.
I've recently started logging all my brass-related activities (neck/full sizings, outside turning, annealing, loading, etc.) to enable more detailed analyses of how different prep regimens might affect accuracy (and/or brass longevity).
Basically, each batch of brass is segregated into its own group and stays in its own 50 round MTM box unless it's a) in the process of being fired, or b) in the tumbler/being prepped along with its 49 brothers. Each box is identified with a batch number, and all activity done on/with that batch is logged in the Big Brass Log Book using that batch number, including reloading info (powder weight/type, primer type, seating depth) and the resultant group-sizes.
At some point down the road, the data will be moved to Excel for analytical and archival purposes, and the book will likely be tossed - although I do like the simplicity of logging the notes on paper initially rather than having a laptop on/near the reloading table - the last thing I need is Varget in my keyboard...
In theory, by doing this, I should be able to track/graph how each batch of brass behaves over its lifetime, and how accuracy gets impacted by various process changes.
In reality, it will probably simply enable me to devote yet another portion of my waking hours to thinking about shooting...
And yes, this is what can happen when a database specialist attempts to take up precision shooting - let the above be a warning to others!
