The Kimber is definitely not a 1911 about which you can really say, "I like the finer things in life, like this".
It's more like, "I didn't want to buy Norinco, and this was what they had in the local gun store".
I agree for the most part with this statement, my local gunstore for example which is better then most has Kimber's in stock.... everything from pro carry II's to a raptor and a Super Match, beautiful guns that are ready to run out of the box with features most of us like, the only competition locally they have is something like Ruger SR1911/Remington R1 and the odd SA Milspec....
I have owned many 1911's, my favorite by far was a full blown custom colt combat with a steel frame, adjustable night sights, mag well and ambi safties..... wish I never sold it.
right now I have a Ruger SR1911 (.45) , STI Trojan (9mm) and a Kimber Pro Carry II (.45)....
Out of that Bunch I would rate them STI, Ruger and then Kimber, and some of the reason I rate the Kimber behind the Ruger are things like Poor Sights on the Kimber as well as the kimber came with only 1x 7 round magazine.
I paid $1k for the Kimber and it being more of a defensive style Pistol I think it should have came with nightsites, and at least 2x 8 round magazines.... seriously the ruger SR1911 came with 2 magazines (1x 8rnd, 1x 7rnd) and a good set of white dot novak "style" combat sights and I only paid $675 for it... and to top it off the ruger came with a nice gun rug.
the STI Trojan is a class unto itself, one of the smoothest feeling 1911's I have owned and very tight slide to frame and slide to barrel fit, very classy and well worth the extra money. (I bought mine used for $950)
so for my Money, I would gladly skip buying a kimber again and go right to the ruger 1911, or if I wanted to spend a little more and get the STI trojan. end of story. (The STI Spartan I would class the Same as Kimber)