Well, we didn't need a FOI request to answer the question. Just ask on CGN!
I thought (logicly... oops) that the information as to who requested the info/possesed the antique would become obsolete as soon as it was written.
Anyway it seems like a waste of time and taxpayers money, considering how many people admit to getting letters for guns they don't even own. Add to that, some antiques share 'serial' numbers, like Remington Derringers and Swede rolling blocks.
Mooncoon's idea of a database of antiques in ciculation is possible, I guess. Note to self: Get to work on the tinfoil hats.
So I wonder about the antiques imported without any letters? Do you think Customs notifies CFC and they attach a note to our file?
A certain number of antiques are not even opened @ Customs.
I thought (logicly... oops) that the information as to who requested the info/possesed the antique would become obsolete as soon as it was written.
Anyway it seems like a waste of time and taxpayers money, considering how many people admit to getting letters for guns they don't even own. Add to that, some antiques share 'serial' numbers, like Remington Derringers and Swede rolling blocks.
Mooncoon's idea of a database of antiques in ciculation is possible, I guess. Note to self: Get to work on the tinfoil hats.
So I wonder about the antiques imported without any letters? Do you think Customs notifies CFC and they attach a note to our file?
A certain number of antiques are not even opened @ Customs.



















































