Sorry folks, you're wastin' your money, for a single stage press happiness is spelled "CO-AX", too many rounds reloaded and sent downrange to not know the difference! May as well spend a bit more and get quality.
The Co-ax has been tested many times and has proven to make ammo with far less runout then any other press, dual rams instead of one, floating jaws(shell holders are universal) which allow best alignment, instant die changes, no need for diff. shellholders, deprimes through a steel tube and leaves ZERO used primer residue on/in your press or ram. Just the fact that it produces quality ammo with little or no runout is enough for me, and just for the record, I don't think there are many out there that have used a reloading press as much as I have.
Well maybe you have an older Co-ax, they had smaller clearance, I use In-line seaters in my Co-ax with the extended shellholders that came with it(Vickerman). The ext. shellholders can be used "floating" or solid with the adaptor to reg. shellholders. The Co-ax develops more leverage then the other presses and I use it for tough bullet pulling jobs, and tough reforming jobs. What was the advantage to the Lee press again??
...What was the advantage to the Lee press again??
So that's it then? The Co-ax has many advantages, including more accurate ammo production, many things have already been touched upon, and the advantage of the Lee is that it is....well......cheap! Like most lee stuff I have tossed over the years.
So that's it then? The Co-ax has many advantages, including more accurate ammo production, many things have already been touched upon, and the advantage of the Lee is that it is....well......cheap! Like most lee stuff I have tossed over the years.



























