Lee Classic Cast Single-Stage Press Handle/Clamp/Other Issues?

Lonesome Donkey

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
Central Alberta
Has anyone who owns this press had any problems with the steel tube handle bending under heavy use?

How about with the adjustable angle clamp with those ratchet faces loosening or slipping, or with the handle loosening in the clamp?

Any other problems to share?

Generally, everybody seems to love this press, but nothing is perfect.

So, what have you experienced?
 
There are 2 Classic Cast presses. Lot of people don't realize this and buy one when they wanted the other.... and I did that initially so I have both.... The standard and the Breech Lock Classic Cast. The Breech lock has the quick change due bushings. Both are very good but I *believe* the regular Classic Cast has a larger opening which may be important for .338+ length cases if that matters to you. I believe the standard can size .50 BMG. The other differences is that the primer catch system in the standard seems to work better as the Breech Lock catch bin sometimes bounces primers. Both are big beefy inexpensive presses that work perfect, are built like ox and are the best deal for a large heavy duty sizing press.
 
The Classic Cast Turret has the same handle and ratchet setup I believe. I've had mine for 10+ years, and it sees lots of use, no problems. You may want to consider it rather than the single stage. The turret can be used as a single stage, or turret., and switch quickly between.
 
There are 2 Classic Cast presses. Lot of people don't realize this and buy one when they wanted the other.... and I did that initially so I have both.... The standard and the Breech Lock Classic Cast. The Breech lock has the quick change due bushings. Both are very good but I *believe* the regular Classic Cast has a larger opening which may be important for .338+ length cases if that matters to you. I believe the standard can size .50 BMG. The other differences is that the primer catch system in the standard seems to work better as the Breech Lock catch bin sometimes bounces primers. Both are big beefy inexpensive presses that work perfect, are built like ox and are the best deal for a large heavy duty sizing press.

Yup, knew about the two presses being available.
I'm not sold on the breech-lock feature so I would buy the standard one with the removable screw-in bushing for the larger dies.
The time difference between screwing in the dies and the breech lock quick-change feature isn't significant unless you were constantly switching dies for some reason.
In any case, I would opt to fit the Hornaday Lock and Load quick-change kit to the Lee if I needed that feature.
It's superior, IMHO.
 
I noticed that the Classic Cast new model has the spent primers dropping out a side port in the ram into a side reservoir and then into the tube, whereas the original model had them fall all the way through the ram like the Redding Big Boss 2, and then into the tube.

Anybody know why the change? Were primers escaping out the side of the ram in the original?
 
I have a classic cast (non breech lock) and have no problems with it. I don't use the primer on the press and had the odd spent primer come out the open slot so I filled the slot with a piece of wood.
 
I have the standard classic cast, I bought it to reform MH .577/450 from 24ga shotshells.
I've put nearly 190lbs of me hanging off of it (feet off the ground for short periods of time) and it hasn't bent or broken. It takes a lot to form the final 1/4" of that brass, even after I re-anneal it.

My main problem was getting the table it's on structurally sound enough to put that much weight on it, I had to get a 1/4" steel plate and fabricate it to fit / clamp it on hardwood.
I bought my press 3 months ago and have formed nearly 50 cases. So far so good.
 
Purchased my Lee C Cast about 5 yrs ago to replace my old one. So far zero problems and I reload for about 15 rifles 2 of which are the 30/378 Wea mad and the 300 RUM. These are not small cases. Just love the press and all of it's features so far.
 
I have the standard classic cast, I bought it to reform MH .577/450 from 24ga shotshells.
I've put nearly 190lbs of me hanging off of it (feet off the ground for short periods of time) and it hasn't bent or broken. It takes a lot to form the final 1/4" of that brass, even after I re-anneal it.

My main problem was getting the table it's on structurally sound enough to put that much weight on it, I had to get a 1/4" steel plate and fabricate it to fit / clamp it on hardwood.
I bought my press 3 months ago and have formed nearly 50 cases. So far so good.

I do the same with my Classic Turret. I've made 100's of 577 and 577/450
 
Classic Cast here since they came out. I don't think you could bend the handle or break the linkage if you tried...
 
Classic Cast here since they came out. I don't think you could bend the handle or break the linkage if you tried...

I don't think you could damage the handle through normal reloading use.

That said, I bent mine, using the press to swage 44 magnum bullets out of 40 s&w brass.

I now have a longer, solid metal handle.
 
I don't think you could damage the handle through normal reloading use.

That said, I bent mine, using the press to swage 44 magnum bullets out of 40 s&w brass.

I now have a longer, solid metal handle.

Since I own an RCBS JR3 from 1972 and a Redding Boss, which both have large diameter solid steel handles, I have always regarded this as something to be expected on any quality reloading press.

But, the Lee Classic Cast is a damn solid looking press. If it worried me much, I could always fit a heavier solid steel handle as you have.
My thoughts were that steel tubes will flex a bit, rather than bend, so it would probably never be an issue for me.
 
Lonesome Donkey -not wanting to call you out or anything, but about a week ago in another thread, you strongly advised a new reloader to go with a Rock Chucker, and avoid the Classic Cast due to the "inferior handle and linkage". You spoke of how the extra cost for the Rock Chucker was well worth it as I recall

So I'm surprised to see you now seeking feedback on the Classic Cast, and it appears actually considering one for yourself.

Of course everyone changes there opinion on things, as should happen as we gain more info, and hopefully wisdom. But I am interested in what made you make such a turnaround.
 
Lonesome Donkey -not wanting to call you out or anything, but about a week ago in another thread, you strongly advised a new reloader to go with a Rock Chucker, and avoid the Classic Cast due to the "inferior handle and linkage". You spoke of how the extra cost for the Rock Chucker was well worth it as I recall

So I'm surprised to see you now seeking feedback on the Classic Cast, and it appears actually considering one for yourself.

Of course everyone changes there opinion on things, as should happen as we gain more info, and hopefully wisdom. But I am interested in what made you make such a turnaround.

If I irritated you because I advised a new reloader to go with the Rock Chucker kit package in that thread, rather than the Lee Classic Cast Turret Press kit package, I can't help that.

It certainly was not meant as a personal affront to you.

I still believe that it was the right choice. The RCBS press is very strong and reliable and has been the first choice of many reloaders for many years. The scale, powder measure, and hand priming tool were also better choices than the accessories in the Lee Turret press kit.
The Lee scale is also justly despised by many who have used it.
In general, the RCBS reloading kit was a far better deal.

That's why I advised the OP of that thread to buy the RCBS kit.

As far as believing that the RCBS Rock Chucker Press has a superior linkage block and handle, I still believe that.
It is worth the price.

As far as the Lee Classic Cast Press is concerned, I also believe that a solid block and a solid steel handle, such as that used by most other manufacturers is a better design, as opposed to the Lee multi-part linkage and tubular steel handle.

However, I never criticized the main casting, ram, main links, or any other part of the Lee Classic Cast Single Stage Press. My concerns were only with regard to the handle and multi-part linkage. I have always felt that the other parts were very strong and well-designed.

But things can, in actual practice, be more reliable than they may seem.
Maybe, despite there being several parts in the linkage to potentially loosen up and slip, and despite having a weaker handle, I wondered if it might still work well.

That's why I invited the opinions and experience of actual users of the Lee Classic Cast Single Stage Press, and in particular, specifically about the aforementioned linkage and handle that I have reservations about.

I think that my Redding Boss, with it's solid block linkage and large diameter solid steel handle is a better press, and that the Redding Big Boss 2 is better yet.

And, as I said, I also think that the Rock Chucker design is also better than the Lee in this regard.

But, the Lee Classic cast Single Stage Press seems to stand up just fine, based on the experiences of those that have responded.

And yes, because the price is right, I just may buy one as a secondary press, despite my misgivings about the linkage and handle.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom