I am sure that people must have discussed this here before I am a little frustrated after a conversation today.
A friend and I were at the Army/Navy surplus in Halifax today. The guy selling the weapons stated that a shotgun could have a barrel length of less than 18" and still be non-restriced.
I told him that no matter how you have your weapon configured, as long as it was able to fire, the minimum length of the weapon had to be 26" folded or not. And as for the barrel, 18" was the minimum.
He agreed with the overall length but argued with the 18in barrel length. Said he had proof to verify.
Maybe I am wrong, I could admit that if proven, but he just seemed to be talking out of his arse.
Again, maybe I am wrong, but not on the talking out of his arse bit; just the minimum legal barrel length.
~M
A friend and I were at the Army/Navy surplus in Halifax today. The guy selling the weapons stated that a shotgun could have a barrel length of less than 18" and still be non-restriced.
I told him that no matter how you have your weapon configured, as long as it was able to fire, the minimum length of the weapon had to be 26" folded or not. And as for the barrel, 18" was the minimum.
He agreed with the overall length but argued with the 18in barrel length. Said he had proof to verify.
Maybe I am wrong, I could admit that if proven, but he just seemed to be talking out of his arse.
Again, maybe I am wrong, but not on the talking out of his arse bit; just the minimum legal barrel length.
~M



















































