I am seriously rethinking whether to get a 22 mag. I think the benefit of 22lr is its cheap, and it's "quiet" - in that you won't bother neighbours past a few hundred yards, or a farm owner if you're helping him rid some varmints.
The 223 is ideal for killing wolves and down, but is noisy.
The 22mag is neither cheap nor quiet, and nor is it ideal for killing wolves/coyotes. So what is it good for?
quotes from another forum (post about 22 wmr and yotes):
sufficient? I said ideal.
I bet to 100 yards, a good 22lr could kill wolves at a good rate. I'm not saying the 22 wmr is a bad round, but the problem with the 22 wmr is that there aren't any good semi-auto options. And by good I mean super-accurate, super-reliable and stainless steel.
Wasn't 22lr the assassins caliber of choice forever? Walk up behind a guy pop him in the back of the head. "Carry on, nothing to see hear folks." I think I remember that the "Ice man" usually only used 22lr. Something about only penetrating the skull then bouncing around inside the skull. No wait that was a Steve Martin movie. Anyhoo I know first hand of an older fellow that would poach deer in PA with 22 lr run Em down in his field with his big red ATC and pop them a couple times in the head. "I feed them, they can feed me"(old school).
The 22mag is neither cheap nor quiet, and nor is it ideal for killing wolves/coyotes. So what is it good for?
I've always wondered why is it that the Israeli Mossad , CIA and the mob have used silenced .22LR's for assassinations for decades, but most gun forums talk about how the .22 is ineffectual for self defense.
I've always wondered why is it that the Israeli Mossad , CIA and the mob have used silenced .22LR's for assassinations for decades, but most gun forums talk about how the .22 is ineffectual for self defense.



























