It's a Stevens, it says right on the receiver. I like how Pharaoh2 snuck it in will all the higher-end shotguns, chances are 90% of the people in this thread would see no practical performance difference between this and their multi-thousand dollar doubles.
That would have to be the 90% that don't know much about doubles, and SXS's in particular. I own a Savage/Stevens Fox Model B (essentially a gussied up 311) and I can tell you without reservation the differences in performance are striking.
The balance of the Model B (or more precisely, the lack of it) makes it harder to effect a smooth swing. With the "B", I find myself working hard to accelerate the swing and just as hard to control the swing at the point of target acquisition. Stevens 311's and comparable guns are too heavy to be carried comfortably in the uplands all day.
On the plus side, 311 variants' barrel assemblies are well regulated (at least, those I've handled all were). This means that at least the gun hits the POA with a decent shot pattern using most conventional loads. The Fox B has a different finish than other 311 variants - a particularly rugged finish, it seems. Despite being dragged through the bush annually, it never displays the nicks and dings that other guns do with the same use.
By far the biggest difference is the reliability. The Savage/Stevens design is one of the poorest box lock designs I've ever seen. Over the 10 years I've owned the "B", it has broken down in the field 5 times - more times than all my other shotguns put together.
My trap U/O goes through 4000-5000 rounds per season. My hunting guns, of which the "B" is one, see less than 50 rounds each per season. 5 failures in a max of 500 shells is POS territory.
Other than the fact that both have two barrels, a Stevens 311 has little in common with most of the guns in this thread.
Thanks for trolling the thread and trying to stir the pot, though.

I needed a good laugh.