That's because traditionally the 40's were considered medium bores. Harks back to the blackpowder and then cordite days. - dan
Agreed, but in a modern smokeless context, perhaps the definitions should change. Not much above .45 anymore...
That's because traditionally the 40's were considered medium bores. Harks back to the blackpowder and then cordite days. - dan
Agreed, but in a modern smokeless context, perhaps the definitions should change. Not much above .45 anymore...
My definition of big bore sort of revolves around that basic, arrived at by experience idea of a stopping rifle for elephant. They learned a few things the hard way and some the easy way. About 2 days after smokeless powder was invented they also discovered that bullets that went much over 2100 did things they had never seen before. There was a French name for it but I forget; in my defense I don't speak French. Experience showed the ele shooters that FMJs with a steel (actually soft iron) with sectional densities of .300 or more at the magic velocity had plenty of penetration but not much of anything for actually impressing an incoming elephant on a frontal brain shot that didn't work out. Bear in mind that black powder 8 bore rifles weren't considered reliable frontal brain shot material either. It all sort of came together with the .450 x 3 1/4". Finally the guys that were trying to get rich in a business that rivalled piracy in risk versus reward had it all together, enough velocity for the relatively novel velocity effect, enough sectional density for reliable penetration, enough frontal area to smack a pissed off elephant so friggin hard that he might just change his mind about killing you long enough for you to give him the second barrel, and bullet construction that would support that. It also by default produced right around 5000 foot pounds of muzzle energy.
I'm flexible, so if a cartridge did everything, sectional density, threshold velocity, bullet construction, enough weight of the right construction bullet, enough frontal area with a solid, and cranked out 5000 fps of stop what you're doing 'cause I don't want to die, but came up a bit short of 45 cal I'd probably let it in as a big bore. Come up short on any of the others and you're out. The .458 Win spent decades coming up short on the velocity and has been viewed with suspition ever since. To me that makes the four five eight marginal as a big bore, but the .416 Rigby is right in there.
My definition of big bore sort of revolves around that basic, arrived at by experience idea of a stopping rifle for elephant. They learned a few things the hard way and some the easy way. About 2 days after smokeless powder was invented they also discovered that bullets that went much over 2100 did things they had never seen before. There was a French name for it but I forget; in my defense I don't speak French. Experience showed the ele shooters that FMJs with a steel (actually soft iron) with sectional densities of .300 or more at the magic velocity had plenty of penetration but not much of anything for actually impressing an incoming elephant on a frontal brain shot that didn't work out. Bear in mind that black powder 8 bore rifles weren't considered reliable frontal brain shot material either. It all sort of came together with the .450 x 3 1/4". Finally the guys that were trying to get rich in a business that rivalled piracy in risk versus reward had it all together, enough velocity for the relatively novel velocity effect, enough sectional density for reliable penetration, enough frontal area to smack a pissed off elephant so friggin hard that he might just change his mind about killing you long enough for you to give him the second barrel, and bullet construction that would support that. It also by default produced right around 5000 foot pounds of muzzle energy.
I'm flexible, so if a cartridge did everything, sectional density, threshold velocity, bullet construction, enough weight of the right construction bullet, enough frontal area with a solid, and cranked out 5000 fps of stop what you're doing 'cause I don't want to die, but came up a bit short of 45 cal I'd probably let it in as a big bore. Come up short on any of the others and you're out. The .458 Win spent decades coming up short on the velocity and has been viewed with suspition ever since. To me that makes the four five eight marginal as a big bore, but the .416 Rigby is right in there.
Wonder were my 375 rum fits then. Have to look up energy.....
Wonder were my 375 rum fits then. Have to look up energy.....
Factory loadings are less powerful than handloads for the cartridge. Remington factory loads push a 300 grain (19 g) bullet at 2760 ft/s (840 m/s),[3] producing 5070 ft·lbf (6.88 kJ) of energy. A handloader can increase the muzzle velocity of a 300gr bullet to 3321 ft/s (900 m/s),[4] and develop 5800 ft·lbf (7.9 kJ).[5]
So that's from Wikipedia.....my personal load is a 260 nosler partition at 3050 ft/sec. Painful before muzzle brake, and still gets your attention plus LOAD since. May be considered light at 260gr, but nothing is getting up from one good hit....in Kanada anyways.
458 Winchester, 375 H&H, 338 Winchester,
8mm magnum
It's in the club of "Mental Mediums"...so much medium that they're a little mental but also highly effective. What I'd be curious to see if how bullets hold up to that kind of speed. My hunch is that everything in the 375 bore was dreamed up with the H&H and maybe the Weatherby in mind. When you start adding hundreds more FPS I'd be leery of anything that wasn't seriously tough.
My definition of big bore sort of revolves around that basic, arrived at by experience idea of a stopping rifle for elephant. They learned a few things the hard way and some the easy way. About 2 days after smokeless powder was invented they also discovered that bullets that went much over 2100 did things they had never seen before. There was a French name for it but I forget; in my defense I don't speak French. Experience showed the ele shooters that FMJs with a steel (actually soft iron) with sectional densities of .300 or more at the magic velocity had plenty of penetration but not much of anything for actually impressing an incoming elephant on a frontal brain shot that didn't work out. Bear in mind that black powder 8 bore rifles weren't considered reliable frontal brain shot material either. It all sort of came together with the .450 x 3 1/4". Finally the guys that were trying to get rich in a business that rivalled piracy in risk versus reward had it all together, enough velocity for the relatively novel velocity effect, enough sectional density for reliable penetration, enough frontal area to smack a pissed off elephant so friggin hard that he might just change his mind about killing you long enough for you to give him the second barrel, and bullet construction that would support that. It also by default produced right around 5000 foot pounds of muzzle energy.
I'm flexible, so if a cartridge did everything, sectional density, threshold velocity, bullet construction, enough weight of the right construction bullet, enough frontal area with a solid, and cranked out 5000 fps of stop what you're doing 'cause I don't want to die, but came up a bit short of 45 cal I'd probably let it in as a big bore. Come up short on any of the others and you're out. The .458 Win spent decades coming up short on the velocity and has been viewed with suspition ever since. To me that makes the four five eight marginal as a big bore, but the .416 Rigby is right in there.
Man those Ruger RSM's looked like some real sweet rifles but were before my time. Why doesn't ruger produce anything like this today in their M77 line?
Man those Ruger RSM's looked like some real sweet rifles but were before my time. Why doesn't ruger produce anything like this today in their M77 line?
The answer to that....belt....dancing bananas.....arguments and trolling aside. For every rifle greater than or equal to .375, there are 100 .308 and smaller sold.
Economy of scale, marketing, and corporate profit. Why switch over a line producing 6.5 manbun selling like hotcakes, to produce 458 whizzbang mag that sits for two years unsold.
The answer to that....belt....dancing bananas.....arguments and trolling aside. For every rifle greater than or equal to .375, there are 100 .308 and smaller sold.
Economy of scale, marketing, and corporate profit. Why switch over a line producing 6.5 manbun selling like hotcakes, to produce 458 whizzbang mag that sits for two years unsold.
No shortage of RSMs around used they’re not rare, I used the crap out of mine and enjoyed stickhunter’s custom .505. For the money, one of the best guns I’ve ever owned.