inthehizzy
CGN frequent flyer
Not everyone is as well off as you my friend. Bit of humble pie.To the nay-sayers... try as set and get back to us.
Concern is not automatically condemnation.
Respectfully.
Not everyone is as well off as you my friend. Bit of humble pie.To the nay-sayers... try as set and get back to us.
Well off? I'm just a retired working stiff... it is just a priority thing.Not everyone is as well off as you my friend. Bit of humble pie.
Concern is not automatically condemnation.
Respectfully.
Apologies if I was obtuse. A solid piece of kit with good glass is a worthy investment. But the Alumina covers, and I’m obviously not alone here, are just eye watering-ly expensive. But I guess that is all relative. IDK.Well off? I'm just a retired working stiff... it is just a priority thing.
To the nay-sayers... try as set and get back to us.
I don't much care what anyone uses... I used Butler Creek caps for many years, but they are constantly failing. Yes, the Alumina caps are expensive, and I agree they should not be as expensive as they are. However, the argument that you won't spend that much to protect a lowly Leupold scope is misguided. The purpose of the caps is to protect the "function" of the optic, so that it can do it's job when you need it to. The purpose is not to protect the value of the optic... in this regard, it doesn't matter if it is a Bushnell or a Zeiss. The Alumina caps have proven to be very effective in that regard, particularly when there is a fleeting opportunity and you have to act quickly. If you are just walking in to a stand and removing or opening the caps for the duration, then the neoprene jacket works just as good. If however, you hunt hard and often, even in foul weather, the caps are worth their weight. To each their own.I’d spring for a set of $300 aluminum caps for say a Schmidt & Bender or a scope in it’s class or price but for a leupold, bwahahaha, a Butler Creek or equivalent is more than enough. But hey you do you as they say.
I don't much care what anyone uses... I used Butler Creek caps for many years, but they are constantly failing. Yes, the Alumina caps are expensive, and I agree they should not be as expensive as they are. However, the argument that you won't spend that much to protect a lowly Leupold scope is misguided. The purpose of the caps is to protect the "function" of the optic, so that it can do it's job when you need it to. The purpose is not to protect the value of the optic... in this regard, it doesn't matter if it is a Bushnell or a Zeiss. The Alumina caps have proven to be very effective in that regard, particularly when there is a fleeting opportunity and you have to act quickly. If you are just walking in to a stand and removing or opening the caps for the duration, then the neoprene jacket works just as good. If however, you hunt hard and often, even in foul weather, the caps are worth their weight. To each their own.
Not justification, just conversation. People are going to use what they are going to use, for their own reasons.Dude, no need to justify, all that matters is that you’re happy and it sounds like you are. BTW what is the top rifle in your post #15 with the iron sight heavy stainless barrel, looks great. Thanks