Leupold CQ/T

[reccman]

What are these worth and are they worth it?

Thanks

 

[NaOH]

They are generaly regarded as crap. They try to do to many things in one package and are a bit fragile.

YMMV

 

[canucklehead]

I looked through one once- it's like looking down a McDonalds straw. There are WAAAAY better options for the money. Junk indeed.

 

[e123456]

del

 

[canucklehead]

I have one and like it.

Have you tried others? The first time I used an Elcan, I thought it was the best optic in the world. After trying everything else, I found I liked it the least!

Not saying there is no satisfied CQ/T customers, but general consensus is that there are MUCH better options for the price. Unless you're a Leupold fanboy and NEED all things Leupold!

 

[e123456]

del

 

[canucklehead]

A better option (in my humble opinion) is this setup. Like I said, I've tried them ALL, and this one takes the cake!

True 1x, better reticle than CQ/T, and probably a bit cheaper! Much better eye relief (almost 5 inches on 1x) and waaaay better FOV.

But if you're happy with the CQ/T - that's ALLL that matters.

 

[dizzy]

the only complaint I hear about the leupold from users is that it really is like looking down a tube, everything else they like and the warranty is outstanding, best in the business. S&B short dot and NF 1-4x24 are much better options but cost a pile more, Millet is much cheaper and getting good reviews. Its the one optic from Leupold I wouldn't buy.

 

[PerversPépère]

And the name is? ...

A better option (in my humble opinion) is this setup. Like I said, I've tried them ALL, and this one takes the cake!

True 1x, better reticle than CQ/T, and probably a bit cheaper! Much better eye relief (almost 5 inches on 1x) and waaaay better FOV.

But if you're happy with the CQ/T - that's ALLL that matters.

Name and model, please.
I guess it'a a Trijicon but looks can be deceiving.
PP.

 

[canucklehead]

It is indeed a Trijicon - TR24G in ADM 30mm Recon mount, to be precise.