Leupold vs Vortex

I don't know anyone, who shoots a high-ish round count, that has been happy with either option for long. YMMV. :)

I have both on other rifles, but when it comes to top precision, neither (maybe a Razor 2 but I have not shot one enough to judge). I have a premier reticles and I will never look back.

my assessment: never had an issue with vortex or my leupolds and I own numerous of both.
Leopold generally has the weight advantage and has a history of quality. Vortex has Leopold in reticles and features.
Vortex has more apparent reliability issues, Leupold lags in innovation.
 
Have you looked at some of the top-end Scorpion stuff? Life time warranty, great glass, amazing workmanship, good price, and distributed by Scorpion Outdoors in MB. While not built here, they are distributed in Canada by Canadians, and with the great quality, it may be worth a look. Some have told me that they are superior to Vortex. I only used the mid priced ones so far, and they are amazing.

There is a small group of scope companies in the last few years that have suddenly turned up on a limited availability usually at smaller dealers, like King Optics, Quigley-Ford and Scorpion Optics. They had no previous market placement but suddenly people are talking about them sometimes as shills. I have a friend in the optics manufacturing business that will produce scopes in most any configuration with what ever name you want on it. The success or failure of these optics is usually related to the amount of money and effort spent in marketing. As far as I know these are Canadian availability only and are only warrantied in Canada. These share various components and technology as they are made to spec in China. I have no problem with entry level optics as long as they are sold at entry level prices however they are often sold at mid to high end prices. Be careful what you buy and make sure they are well supported. We carry most regular brands of optics and have looked at the above listed lines but have chosen to pass for the reasons outlined. Sometimes optics companies come out of left field like Vortex but they have significant engineering and development behind them not just offering re branded products. Careful what you buy as these kind of optics offer very little resale value especially the ones that were over sold at the original high price. Phil.
 
Last edited:
Most Leupold glass is entry level at high prices IMO. I will not buy any other of their products. Warranty sucks too in my experience.
 
I've had good luck with my gen 2 PST, but with Bushnell offering 30% mail in rebates right now I'd be looking at their elite tactical scopes. After the rebate you could have a DMR 2/HDMR 2 for a similar price as those two scopes.
IIRC, Precision Optics (vendor here) put an additional discount on top, bringing the total up to 37% off.

The Elite Tactical DMR2 is definitely a contender here. IMO it's a better option than the Vortex by a wide margin.
 
Have you looked at some of the top-end Scorpion stuff? Life time warranty, great glass, amazing workmanship, good price, and distributed by Scorpion Outdoors in MB. While not built here, they are distributed in Canada by Canadians, and with the great quality, it may be worth a look. Some have told me that they are superior to Vortex. I only used the mid priced ones so far, and they are amazing.

Scorpion scopes are low end, even their "high end" ones are sketchy at best. If they were half the price they would be worth a look as a budget scope but for $450 give me a Leupold VX-Freedom with CDS or even a Vortex. About the only thing Scorpion does well is their bowstrings.
 
Just for clarification, what is exactly the difference between this "Leupold Guarantee" and e.g. Burris' Forever Warranty, Bushnell,s Iron Glad Warranty, Vortex's VIP Warranty,...?

Vortex is completely transferable, like leupold. The difference is that vortex actually gives a crap about the Canadian market. Leupold makes us deal with Koth who as noted above sucks mega balls to deal with.
 
The first time I heard about vortex and their "warranty" it sounded perfect, until I really thought about it, I seem to remember them claiming it didn't matter how or why you broke it, they would fix or replace it, it seemed like the emphasis was on replace.

And then you read all these stories about guys over torquing the rings crushing the tubes, purposely driving over them or swinging them against a wall and sending it back and getting a brand new scope in return, that's not a warranty, that's a built in replacement program and the cost of that program has to come from somewhere, where else besides quality or price point would that difference come from.

That being said, when i was in the market for a hunting monocular vortex was the only company that offered the price and features i was looking for and my solo mono 8x36 has been great, going 3 or 4 years now with no problems, it would be nice if they made it easier to attach butler creek caps to both ends but I would buy one again if I lost this one.

I can't comment on korths warranty service as I've never needed it, I've always heard it is good and fair but never had to utilize it, I've contacted them once inquiring about a reticle and turret change and they answered right away and explained everything, YMMV.

I'll admit I don't shoot my guns as often as the average guy here does, I'm probably in the bottom 5-10%, that being said I hunt for a few weeks every year and makes 5-8 range trips/year, I've dropped my rifles a few times, banged them against a truck cab or tree or forgotten a cap open and let the bell end fill with snow once(luckily no shot presented lol) and not once has any of my leupolds failed me so I'm happy with them.

Vortex is completely transferable, like leupold. The difference is that vortex actually gives a crap about the Canadian market. Leupold makes us deal with Koth who as noted above sucks mega balls to deal with.
 
I've battled with this question myself for ages. I have only owned Leupold but have found myself getting frustrated with them. I own the Leupold VX3i LRP 4-14 MIL FFP and I paid about 1400 for it after taxes if I recall. That's allot of money... I like the scope but I wish it had an illuminated option. Now I only use mils so the next option would be a MK5HD for about 2300-3000 before tax. No doubt an amazing optic but I feel like Leupold needs to offer more options for mils and illuminated optics at competitive prices.

OP wants Mils, and FFP. Leupold has some limited options and if OP is says a tikka is out of his price range then so are the mark 5,6 and 8's basically his only option is a VX3i LRP. Vortex has allot of options in MILS illuminated and various price points. If OP wants to built a super budget fun with FFP and MILS he has the option to look at the diamondback tactical, upgrade that to a Viper HS-T, or upgrade that to a PST or go all out and get a Razor.

Leupold is great but they just lack options. Vortex has tons of options and more selection. Leupold needs to start making more glass in mils IMO as now more and more people are making that switch.

I'm in the market for a new scope for a hunting rifle of mine and I am probably going to go with vortex, FFP, mils, and illuminated reticle. I like my Leopold but the fatal flaw with a ffp optic without an illuminated reticle is if you put it on a black bear or a really dark moos with bad light, low light or lite shining at your face you lose that reticle. Speaking from experience. I wish the LRP had illumination, and a shorter turret...

As for its function on the range no issues shooting paper.
 
Back
Top Bottom