OK, you shoot on public land. So, you aren't a pistol shooter, and a handgun ban wouldn't make any difference to your shooting activity.
"Assault weapon ban" would, as it would likely target any non-restricted semi-auto.
OK, you shoot on public land. So, you aren't a pistol shooter, and a handgun ban wouldn't make any difference to your shooting activity.
We need a Canadian version of Alex Jones.....will you be our guy Mr. Wolverine?
Fixed that for you...Andrew Limp-wristed Scheer, aka The Wimp - Conservative Party of Canada Leader
Fixed that for you...
What about a challenge of the actual law itself? Could it be done? Has it been tried?
The problem is that nobody wants to kick in any money. Over 2 million gun owners and the CSSA has fifty thousand members. What a joke. I've always said, it's amazing we have the freedoms we still do. There's what, three or four hundred thousand RPAL holders in Canada. If everyone chipped in just 100 bucks that's 40 million dollars. That could go a long way for the CSSA/NFA especially for focusing on ridings where Liberals are vulnerable. And going by all the Ed Browns and Desert Eagles on the EE, a lot of us can afford more than $100. Gun owners are also their own worst enemy. We're not a united front. Almost all gun owners who don't own handguns wont lift a finger for guys who do. I've even had arguments at my club with guys who support the prohibiting of 12.6s back in the day. Having open houses won't do anything. Pro-Liberal media polls say 60% of Canadians support banning handguns. So if you take away Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, most people in the rest of the country are generally ambivalent on guns. It isn't the average Canadian who's demanding more gun control. It's practically a dozen people. And no matter how good of an impression we make, gun control will never be a ballot box issue for most Canadians. And it doesn't need to be. We just need to get active and get serious (and less stingy) before it's too late.




























