Liberal Handgun Ban?

Not on this dealers forum but others. Why would somebody want to advertise "Pi$$ of the Government by buying ..."

I don't even know why they do this other than their profits.

Pissing somebody off by buying their leftovers in cause for their "rights"? Go FYS!
 
riversrest said:
Not on this dealers forum but others. Why would somebody want to advertise "Pi$$ of the Government by buying ..."

I don't even know why they do this other than their profits.

Pissing somebody off by buying their leftovers in cause for their "rights"? Go FYS!
Click to expand...

Calm down,neddily-diddily-diddily-diddily they did their best, shoddidly-idddly-idddly-diddly Gotta be nice, Hostility-ility -diddily... AH HELL ! diddily ding dong-crap! cant you morons do anything right?
 
riversrest said:
Selling handguns and all other kind of firearms is mostly giving profit to the dealers. So, Why don't they stand up "for real" while their lively hood is questioned? Instead they try to dump off overstock. But it's all for the sake of Canadian gun owners like - pieces of useless metal and SKSs of questionable quality.

Ah........ And I don't want to go there.


RR
Click to expand...

I haven't seen Wolverine mention sales once in this thread, so I don't see how you consider this an attempt to "move overstock", and they ARE standing up "for real" in this case- perhaps you're not aware of their speech in Parliament against C71. Maybe you'd like to elaborate on exactly what more you expect dealers to do here?
 
Squiggy said:
This is an old video, listen to what Canada was doing already back then.

Click to expand...

Sad that just about every gun in that barrel indicates a gun owner surrendering his rights not only as a gun owner but as a citizen and a human being.
Usually because most gun owners are 'too busy' :rolleyes:(classic cop out for cowardice, apathy and cheapness) to participate in the fight.
 
krazykaiser said:
First they came for the handguns and I didn't speak up because I didn't own a handgun.
Then they came for the black rifles and I didn't speak up because I didn't own a black rifle.
Then they came for all remaining firearms and I didn't speak up because they told me it was for safety and security of all.
Finally they came for all my rights, because nobody was left to defend them.
Click to expand...

yup, always good to reread this.........
 
essorx said:
Clubs are the first to push for silly stupid rules, like no rapid fire, or no more than 1 bullet in the mag, or mandatory chamber flags when guns are racked. What do you really expect from them ? Most of the directors are retired and don't have much to lose in a gun ban, or are plain skeet fudd. They probably hates the guts out of the latest kid in the club coming to do a mag dump on their beat up SKS.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
Frack no. I'm going to shoot on crown land. Do you realize that I'm going shooting to be left the heck alone, I don't want to have to deal with people and certainly not get in politics.

Btw, thanks to throw me under the bus.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
"Assault weapon ban" would, as it would likely target any non-restricted semi-auto.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
On the long run, no matter how many people we convert, I don't think it's going to make a difference. Canadians are overwelmingly against firearms. We're pretty much fracked.

My plan ? secure enough money to move south of the border, bending over backward in the mean time, trying to escape the upcoming gulag.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
At this point, I don't even consider him man. He could become a "she" that wouldn't make a damn difference.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
You're alone on that. Harper was stupid enough to make it more difficult for permanent resident to get citizenship. Now you're all right, I'm not a Canadian so I can't understand your struggle, yadi, yada.

All in all, I thought Canada was a great balance between the US and Europe... I was probably wrong. As I mentioned, my plan are now to focus on shielding a ####load of money by any means (ie. even contrary to good morals, though still legal... kinda) and get a ranch in the US, in a friendly state.

edit: and I'll probably freeload on healthcare by hopefully keeping my future Canadian citizenship and a dummy residency in BC.

edit2: the CPC are center left (at best), probably too much on the left for my taste anyway, nothing close to "Conservative". Between a cuck and a cuck, there isn't much difference.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
I don't do blackmail, which is the CPC strategy. People have been owning unregistered firearms for 20+ years, I'll be fine.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
He's not pro-gun, he will never unrestrict the AR-15 or allow for CCW. At best, he's status quo with the C-68 cucks.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
For all I know, restricted owner are already under the bus, and have been for 23 years. FWIW, restricted owner (and mods) were also throwing crown-land shooters under the bus.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
No you can't, you'd need to have a CFO approved range on your land to do so.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
Because the wimp is just as socialist as the turd when it comes down to the dairy or poultry industry.

edit: ... and the plague of multiculturalism.
Click to expand...

essorx said:
I'm pointing out very specific argements. Range are probably not the best representation we can get. Beside all the internal politic from directors No matter how "fun" it can be, we're talking to urban people. "Shooting" is going to be just another hobby, at best, and it's never going to protect us from anything. The big scary CBC is still going to be here to spread FUD and it will still be an expandable "expensive" hobby. Above all, it shouldn't be our only argument against the liberals. You will *not* convince someone to vote against what they have been ingrained to hate based on guns alone.

If the gun arguments is used, it *has to be* part of a greater narative against cultural marxism practiced by the liberals.
Click to expand...

A compilation of contributions to the thread.
 
I am amazed...and disgusted...by the persistence of Fudds speaking out against the ownership of handguns and restricted rifles.
Do these quislings not understand that their semi-auto hunting shotguns...among others...will be in the Liberal's crosshairs too?
It's nothing short of astonishing.

Get organized and united, now. It's our only hope.
Join the CCFR!
Join the Conservative Party of Canada!
 
Last edited:
twofast said:
Have a Voice and Wear these Proud !!
Click to expand...

We have our "voice" in federal politics and that is Maxime Bernier. But we failed to get him elected as leader of the Conservatives. Now we have a second chance.

Join the 'Mad Max Club'.

https://www.maximebernier.com/mad_max

https://www.maximebernier.com/a_fair_gun_policy_for_canada

PLEASE EVERYONE READ THE ABOVE ^^^ LINK!

The 2019 election is already lost so we now need to focus on 2023. As gun owners, Bernier is our only faint ray of hope...
 
Last edited:
I initially thought that a complete ban/confiscation was unlikely. Now I'm not so sure. Turdeau now needs some sort of deflection from the NAFTA and the Trans Mountain Pipeline disasters. Screwing over gun owners will secure his lock on the powerful retard vote...
 
Ironheart said:
Thank you for this John.....just last week I got a friend to make his first restricted purchase.

Also been pushing hard for friends to take their RPAL course.

People just don't get the magnitude of what is going on......i spoke to a 63 year old co worker last nite for a few hours about this. He's an avid shooter of pistol and trap, he just writes it off as a ban will never happen. Then get mad at me for preaching it lol

It's hard to get it thru a lot of people's brains...especially the older generation I know
Click to expand...

Yeah it REALLY pisses me right the hell off. Did we learn absolutely NOTHING from High River? Or the 90's? Damn. Facepalm. Bang head on wall. People got a short memory.
 
Can anyone make an educate guess as to what the ban would actually look like for owners of restricted firearms? Would it most likely constitute a ban on sales of both new and used guns in the future or can you actually see the RCMP expecting everyone to actually turn in their guns that they paid hard-earned money for?
 
Ericstraordinary said:
Can anyone make an educate guess as to what the ban would actually look like for owners of restricted firearms? Would it most likely constitute a ban on sales of both new and used guns in the future or can you actually see the RCMP expecting everyone to actually turn in their guns that they paid hard-earned money for?
Click to expand...

Never underestimate. Remember the history lessons and some people genuinely believe anything is justified to take away them scary guns!
 
Ericstraordinary said:
Can anyone make an educate guess as to what the ban would actually look like for owners of restricted firearms? Would it most likely constitute a ban on sales of both new and used guns in the future or can you actually see the RCMP expecting everyone to actually turn in their guns that they paid hard-earned money for?
Click to expand...

I will say both.....
First step will be grandfathering of what you have and no possibility to sell them, nor buy new ones (This has just been put in place in France a few weeks back),
Then, in a little while (after more gang shootings or terrorist acts) they will go Australian and British style.....
But I know nothing........
 
Ericstraordinary said:
Can anyone make an educate guess as to what the ban would actually look like for owners of restricted firearms? Would it most likely constitute a ban on sales of both new and used guns in the future or can you actually see the RCMP expecting everyone to actually turn in their guns that they paid hard-earned money for?
Click to expand...

It's really hard to say. First you would need to eliminate rationality or logic and then try to imagine what a feeble minded mental degenerate would do...
 
tiriaq said:
A compilation of contributions to the thread.
Click to expand...

getting the risk of getting pink'ed here, but in all honesty, what point are you trying to make ? You are quoting me without a context and keep pointing finger, which is not much different than what the left keep on doing.

I exposed my argument in the last message you quoted, trying to see the bigger pictures than just "us", where in my argument am I wrong ?
 
essorx said:
getting the risk of getting pink'ed here, but in all honesty, what point are you trying to make ? You are quoting me without a context and keep pointing finger, which is not much different than what the left keep on doing.

I exposed my argument in the last message you quoted, trying to see the bigger pictures than just "us", where in my argument am I wrong ?
Click to expand...

IMO people like you are part of the problem. No firm stand, opinions or solutions on anything.

I'd rather be pinked than being associated with your style of thinking.

RR
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom