Lighten up the front on a AR15

The S&J 16" is already a light profile barrel. There is lighter, but other then making it shorter, you'd be limited to finding a pencil type barrel.

I will assume they were shooting it with the stock collapsed.

I think we need to know what else you have on the gun. Optics can add a lot of weight, surprisingly.
 
The S&J 16" is already a light profile barrel. There is lighter, but other then making it shorter, you'd be limited to finding a pencil type barrel.

I will assume they were shooting it with the stock collapsed.

I think we need to know what else you have on the gun. Optics can add a lot of weight, surprisingly.

Took off optics so they could learn shooting with irons...plus wanted to reduce the weight. Yes stock was collapsed or in 1st notch position. Balance is definitely key, since they had no issues with the versamax.

I was thinking of getting/building a new upper for this purpose, but wanted to hear out any alternatives or options to also improve my existing AR.
 
How often are you going to take them out?

How much do you shoot it?

How much are you looking to spend?


I'd suggest a lightweight upper in 10.5" if it's going to be an every so often thing, or purchase a Bushmaster Carbon 15 if it's going to be a regular thing.

Going with a lightweight barrel and carbon fiber forend will be about half the cost of a Carbon 15 or the cost of a shorty Norc upper.
 
It's been once every month or 2 lately. Might be more as they get older.

In terms of shooting it? I try to attend a match a month if I could. Will be more once my form6 has been approved.

I already have a list of out of stock items I want to buy from you, and you want me to add an AR to the list??? You are so evil...but I am so weak... :)))
 
"Pencil" is light profile, no? From the pics on the S&J website, I wouldn't say that's a light profile. Not HBar, but not light either. But they only show a shorty barrel.

It's a Gov't profile, what is considered light profile to my knowledge, I could be wrong.
Anything lighter is a special profile from what I can tell.

I have an ultralight build I put together using this 16" DPMS SS barrel that I got off S&J years ago. I has the same width before the gas black and behind it. It's about as light as you can get for a 16" but it seems rather rare.
 
Took off optics so they could learn shooting with irons...plus wanted to reduce the weight. Yes stock was collapsed or in 1st notch position. Balance is definitely key, since they had no issues with the versamax.

I was thinking of getting/building a new upper for this purpose, but wanted to hear out any alternatives or options to also improve my existing AR.

Honestly the rail does make a difference. Going down to something carbine length will not only cut the weight, but shift that weight more rearward.

You could try teaching them a biathlon stance, but, it's not the most stable and they could fall over from the recoil due to their size.

I would purpose build them an upper. Streamlined as possible. 11.5" Barrel, Hogue tube, and maybe a tiny red dot.

I would also wonder if there are other reasons they don't like it that they aren't telling you. Forcing them to learn irons might not be a good route.
Something easy and fun like a red dot might get them more stoked on the gun helping them push past the learning curve.
Start them off learning the fundamentals of holding it and shooting it, then move onto irons later.
Having to overcome too many things at a time could be overwhelming.

From my experience with some new shooters, there is an aspect of psychological fatigue that goes a long with it.
They can perceive the gun as being heavier then it actually is if it's not fun too shoot.
If they are having a fun time and it's easy to shoot, it will give them excitement and a boost of stamina if you will.
That kinda of thing happens with my GF all the time. If shes not into it, it might as well be a cinder block.
2 main things that turn her off is any kind of optics other then a red dot, and if it's too loud.

That makes me wonder what kind of muzzle device you have ?
The AR does not have a lot of recoil impulse, but it is a sharp and snappy impulse, especially on a 16" carbine.
Things like a heavier buffer, and maybe even an adjustable gas block can smooth it out.
Going back to the muzzle, if you have a break and pile concussion on top of that it could be startling to them, cause the blast from the small 223 round can also be quite a bit more loud and snappy then that from larger guns.

Also, what kind of trigger does it have. I would also consider that if you have a typical ~7lb mil-spec, the trigger too might be too heavy for them, further detracting from the fun.


I would also consider, if you're going to get a new upper, one of those 22LR poly receiver dealies.
That's should drop some weight, and also mellow things right down. Throw a tiny red dot on it, and they should have a blast.
 
It's a Gov't profile, what is considered light profile to my knowledge, I could be wrong.
Anything lighter is a special profile from what I can tell.

Hmmmm. I'd consider something like the Daniel Defense LW profile to be "lightweight", and it's readily available.

Gov't profile is basically half an hbar, right?
 
I have a 14.5" Noveske Afghan with a medium weight stainless barrel.
Arguably not a light setup but when combined with a 13.5" NSR rail and a magpul UBR buttstock it becomes a perfectly balanced carbine. With a Surefire brake and an H buffer it has 0 muzzle lift and nearly no recoil.

I also have a Stag 3G with an 18" fluted barrel and a Samson 15" Evolution handguard.
It seems nose heavy when combined with the Magpul ACR buttstock.

The problem with the Evolution handguard is that it requires backing plates to add rail sections which adds quite a lot of weight compared to the NSR setup.

Last week at the range someone handed me a 7.5" PDW setup to try and that thing felt like lead compared to either of my rifles.

Moving weight around will help balance out a rifle.
 
Last edited:
2 words: Christensen Arms.


Hummmm fiber!
SAM_0028_zps0ffcd7e9.jpg
 
OP: I've been saying this forever. The new version of Stoner's lightweight space gun isn't what he intended. It's heavy, covered in crap, overly reliant on electronic sights, and poorly balanced. When I go from my m4 profile barrel, with eotech, quad rail, foregrip and flip to side magnifier, to pencil barrel, vietnam style AR, the difference is unbelievably massive. My Type 97nsr is a joy to swing around and point, and balances beautifully, despite it's odd appearance. You really have to go from one to the other to appreciate the difference. Frankly, if I were taking a ride into battle, I'd be fine either way, but if you wanted me to walk in and out, you can keep the sack of potatoes with grips, I'll take the light, fast, easy pointing gun, thanks.
 
The C-8is heavier than the C-7A2! A mistaken belief in original profile barrels have burdened infantrymen for no reason!
Are bean counters and military bureaucrats so stupid? Of course they are. They even manage to convince the infantry that their mistakes are true.
 
Back
Top Bottom