And to huntinggearguy:
I watched the video you posted and your comments, also comments from users. I also watched many of your other videos. You lost credibility with your review about the Siberian.
I included match footage where it failed on me. I had first hand experience with failure to fire, fail to extract, fail to feed, and bolt hold open issues. I was more than fair to the rifle considering the various failure types I saw and I was specific in my critiques of the rifle.
I'm confused as to what you're even claiming for this rifle. Which scenario is more likely?
1. A few independent reviewers are out to get BCL for no good reason
2. This rifle is a lemon and the reviewers lied about its warranty trips
3. This rifle is a lemon and the warranty trips failed to resolve its reliability issues
This experience with the Siberian is pretty similar to my experience with the 102.




















































