Not trying to wave a finger, just too many people ask for loads and IMO never question if they are safe by checking other sources.
My Hornady book shows the following for 140gr.
Min 38.6gr 0f 4831 2300fps
MAX 44.0gr of 4831 2600fps
To me it seems Hornady is always cautious on what they print so usually very safe.
However Lyman is completely different 49th Edition for 140gr jacketed HPBT.
Min. 41.5gr using 4831SC 2258fps
MAX 46.0gr using 4831SC 2508 fps
Since both are using the same type bullet I reload 44gr of 4831SC and show no signs of pressure problems. According to Lyman I am OK, Hornady top of the range. Bearing surface of the bullet is a factor too many ignore.
Don't go by what I say, as who knows what your gun can accept.
There is a bit more to it than that. The loads in most loading manuals use M96 actions for test beds.
With the newer actions, some higher density loads are acceptable.
Many years ago, International Firearms offered a great deal on 6.5x55 components. Included in that deal were cases with corrosive primers, loaded with a fast flake powder, under wooden bullets. The deal was, they supplied enough Bofors #44 powder (imr3031) and a mix of bullets, including 97 grain hollow points, 140 grain FBSP hunting bullets, 160 grain cupro nickel round nose that had a crimp mark about 3/8 in from the bottom.
I will only list the recommended loads for 140 grain bullets with the surplus powder. 34-37 grains of #44, which is exactly the same load for 3031 in the Lyman 45 manual. 4831 for the 6.5x55 wasn't listed in the Lyman manual but the Hornady manual listed it from 40-47 grains with very similar velocities. Both companies used the model 94 Swedish carbines with 18 in barrels to measure velocities. Unimpressive to say the least.
The latest Lyman manual still uses the M94 with 18 in bbl and even the latest Hornady manual still uses the 96 action, albeit with a 29in bbl.
I won't start up on the strengths of these actions as we already know they are some of the best out there.
The thing about pressure pertaining to bearing surface, is relevant but only to a slight degree. The big thing is more likely the 7.5 to 1 twist rate in those old barrels.
The loads in those rifles were considered safe at around 45,000 CUP.
In a modern rifle, like a Tikka T3, Sako, Remington 700 or Winchester Model 70 etc, those loads would be considered to be starting loads.
This is IMHO of course.
Maybe Ganderite, with his in depth knowledge could chime in here.