I've had a 22" Marlin 1895 classic, an 1895 cowboy and just picked up a new production Winchester 1886.
Quality wise the 1886 is head and shoulders above the recent marlins(that I've seen on the shelf) with excellent fit and finish, and good machining(and I'm a picky machinist). It's heavy as hell though but built like a bank vault so iit is forgivable and I knew that going in to the purchase. I have not shot it yet but the crescent steel buttplace has "bruise master 2000" written all over it.
The winchester is a top quality heirloom piece, but not a lightweight hunting gun by any stretch. Worth every penny.
As for the Marlins, both of mine were pre remington vintage and tthe fit/finish was excellent, checkering was deep and clean on the classic. Both guns pointed well and were easy to carry, even the mile long barrel on the cowboy which was very light and balanced due to the octagine profile. Neither gun I found obnoxious to shoot and were very accurate.
I'd have a hard time paying what they are asking for the new guns with the god awful "checkering" lasered in and the crooked sights I've seen on some the last few months.
If you can find a good 22" 1895 classic it would be my choice for a hunter/plinker since you have a manageable size, weight and scope mounting option. Just look them over carefully if buying new, hopefully the QC issues are sorted by now.