I've been looking at buying a rangefinder for a while now and when I thought I knew what I wanted I discovered the Leupold RX-600.
Here's what I'm looking for:
- reliable
- waterproof
- distance in meters but not a deal breaker
- at least 600 yr, if it can go up to 900 yr even better
- compact preferably
- cheap, preferably $150 or less shipped.
I thought a used Bushnell might be the one but then I looked at the Leupold RX-600 and now I'm leaning towards the Leupold. To make matters worse, I looked at the RX-750.
The 750 has rifle/bow mode, inclinometer, compass, temperature, last target, ballistic range and a few other features.
The problem is, the cheapest I could find it was $250.
What do you think, should just forget about the Leupolds and buy something cheap that works or should I do my best and buy the RX-750? Are the extra features on the 750 worth the extra money compared to the 600?
Thanks.
D.
Here's what I'm looking for:
- reliable
- waterproof
- distance in meters but not a deal breaker
- at least 600 yr, if it can go up to 900 yr even better
- compact preferably
- cheap, preferably $150 or less shipped.
I thought a used Bushnell might be the one but then I looked at the Leupold RX-600 and now I'm leaning towards the Leupold. To make matters worse, I looked at the RX-750.
The 750 has rifle/bow mode, inclinometer, compass, temperature, last target, ballistic range and a few other features.
The problem is, the cheapest I could find it was $250.
What do you think, should just forget about the Leupolds and buy something cheap that works or should I do my best and buy the RX-750? Are the extra features on the 750 worth the extra money compared to the 600?
Thanks.
D.




















































